Difference between revisions of "JPOS09"
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
=Positron production= | =Positron production= | ||
− | + | ==Energy options== | |
At > 50 GeV incident electron energies, an undulator can be used to generate MeV energy photons which pair produce in a target. You get about 200 photons for each incident electron? | At > 50 GeV incident electron energies, an undulator can be used to generate MeV energy photons which pair produce in a target. You get about 200 photons for each incident electron? | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The undulator and compton techniques create polarized photons and then polarized positrons. For the conventional method you could use off axis bremmstrahlung to create linear photons or polarize the incident electrons and have the polarization transfer. | The undulator and compton techniques create polarized photons and then polarized positrons. For the conventional method you could use off axis bremmstrahlung to create linear photons or polarize the incident electrons and have the polarization transfer. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Thermal energy production== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sergey Chemerisov was able to capture 100 more reflected positrons (positrons emitted on the same side of the target as the incoming electron beam) than transmitted positrons at 20 MeV incident electron energies. | ||
=Polarimetry= | =Polarimetry= |
Revision as of 21:15, 26 March 2009
http://conferences.jlab.org/JPOS09/
Positron_Workshop_2009 : March 25-27, 2009
By September 2009:
Wed 3/25/09
2 exchange
looking for positron currents of 1
A in Hall C or 100 nA in Hall B.Positron production
Energy options
At > 50 GeV incident electron energies, an undulator can be used to generate MeV energy photons which pair produce in a target. You get about 200 photons for each incident electron?
At between 1 and 50 GeV, back scattered compton photons may be the optimal choice for producing positrons.
The conventional method of using a converter target my be the best choice for incident electron energies less than 1 GeV.
The undulator and compton techniques create polarized photons and then polarized positrons. For the conventional method you could use off axis bremmstrahlung to create linear photons or polarize the incident electrons and have the polarization transfer.
Thermal energy production
Sergey Chemerisov was able to capture 100 more reflected positrons (positrons emitted on the same side of the target as the incoming electron beam) than transmitted positrons at 20 MeV incident electron energies.
Polarimetry
P. Schuller (DESY) has the iron block used in E-166 at SLAC for the compton transmission polarimeter. The incident photon Energy went up to 8 MeV.
We could measure positron polarization by measuring the polarization of photons from the positron annihilation. Compton scattering depends on the polarization of the struck atomic electrons. An external B-field will polarize the FE block. You can either flip the direction of the B-file or the direction of the incident photon polarization to measure the photon polarization.
The IAC could make a compton transmission polarimeter to use on the photo-fission experiment as well as a proto-type for JLab.
Thermal positrons
How big is the user thermal positron user community?