Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
− | + | Same table as above but with the cut 1.0 < W < 1.5 | |
{| border="1" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 | {| border="1" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
|[[Image:pion_cos_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_Wlt1.3.gif|300px]] || [[Image:missing_mass_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.3.gif|300px]] || [[Image:Q_sqrd_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.3.gif|300px]] | |[[Image:pion_cos_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_Wlt1.3.gif|300px]] || [[Image:missing_mass_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.3.gif|300px]] || [[Image:Q_sqrd_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.3.gif|300px]] | ||
|}<br> | |}<br> | ||
− | + | ||
+ | Same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.5 GeV and -0.2 < <math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math> < 0 | ||
{| border="1" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 | {| border="1" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 | ||
Line 78: | Line 79: | ||
− | + | I have applied the cut only on <math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math>: 0.4 < <math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math> < 0.6.(I know it does not look as good as it should be.)<br> | |
[[Image:phi_angle_diff_in_cm_frame_cut_on_costheta_0_4-0_6.gif|500px]] | [[Image:phi_angle_diff_in_cm_frame_cut_on_costheta_0_4-0_6.gif|500px]] |
Revision as of 10:03, 25 June 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
- Electron Momentum vs EC_total
- Missing Mass
- vs
The angle is (0, 360).
electron sector | after correction | ||
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 |
The angle is (0, 360).
vs | vs | vs |
Same table as above but with the cut 1.0 < W < 1.5
vs | vs | vs |
Insert the same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.3 GeV
vs | vs | vs |
Same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.5 GeV and -0.2 <
< 0vs | vs | vs |
I have applied the cut only on : 0.4 < < 0.6.(I know it does not look as good as it should be.)
electron sector | ||
1 | ||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 |