Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
;<math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math> vs <math>\phi_{diff}^{CM}</math> | ;<math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math> vs <math>\phi_{diff}^{CM}</math> | ||
[[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts.gif|300px]][[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts_negative_and_positive_angles.gif|300px]]<br> | [[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts.gif|300px]][[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts_negative_and_positive_angles.gif|300px]]<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1946] | ||
=<math>\varphi^{LAB}</math>= | =<math>\varphi^{LAB}</math>= |
Revision as of 03:17, 23 June 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
- Electron Momentum vs EC_total
- Missing Mass
- vs
- vs
The angle is (0, 360).
electron sector | after correction | ||
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 |
The angle is (0, 360).
I have applied the following cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
electron sector | after correction | |||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 |
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
9 files. The cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
I used 27 files. The cut is applied on
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_pion_sector