Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Image:electron_theta_vs_electron_phi_angle_in_lab_frame_using_trl_variables_with_cuts.gif|400px]]<br> | [[Image:electron_theta_vs_electron_phi_angle_in_lab_frame_using_trl_variables_with_cuts.gif|400px]]<br> | ||
| − | [[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts.gif| | + | [[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts.gif|300px]][[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts_negative_and_positive_angles.gif|300px]]<br> |
=<math>\varphi^{LAB}</math>= | =<math>\varphi^{LAB}</math>= | ||
Revision as of 02:06, 23 June 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
The angle is (0, 360).
| electron sector | after correction | ||
| 1 |  |
 |
|
| 2 |  |
 |
|
| 3 |  |
 |
|
| 4 |  |
 |
|
| 5 |  |
 |
|
| 6 |  |
 |
|
The angle is (0, 360).
I have applied the following cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
| electron sector | after correction | |||
| 1 |  |
 |
|
|
| 2 |  |
 |
|
|
| 3 |  |
 |
|
|
| 4 |  |
 |
|
|
| 5 |  |
 |
|
|
| 6 |  |
 |
|
|
I used 27 files. The cut is applied on .
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_pion_sector
