Difference between revisions of "Metalica TestPulseoutput 12-20-07"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This time we used Metalica but the results are not so different. | This time we used Metalica but the results are not so different. | ||
| − | The bottom line appears to be that we get a x4 attenuation and not a net amplification deispite our efforts the change the configuration for the better. We also | + | The bottom line appears to be that we get a x4 attenuation and not a net amplification deispite our efforts the change the configuration for the better. We also note that channels 1-11 of the postamp proto type attenuate by a factor of four but channels 12-16 have a signal independent of the input. |
| − | The | + | The voltage was changed<br> |
| − | + | =Operating Conditions= | |
| − | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_3.7v.jpg|200px]][[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5v.jpg|200px]][[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.1v.jpg|200px]][[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.2v.jpg|200px]] | + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_3.7v.jpg|200px]]<br> |
| − | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.3v.jpg|200px]][[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.4v.jpg|200px]][[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.5v.jpg|200px]] | + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5v.jpg|200px]]<br> |
| − | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.6v.jpg|200px]][[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.7v.jpg|200px]][[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.8v.jpg|200px]] | + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.1v.jpg|200px]]<br> |
| − | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_6v.jpg|200px]] | + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.2v.jpg|200px]]<br> |
| + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.3v.jpg|200px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.4v.jpg|200px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.5v.jpg|200px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.6v.jpg|200px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.7v.jpg|200px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_5.8v.jpg|200px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:metalica_160mv_input-postamp_out_6v.jpg|200px]]<br> | ||
[http://www.iac.isu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/Mini-prototype#Post_Amp_NIM_Module] | [http://www.iac.isu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/Mini-prototype#Post_Amp_NIM_Module] | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 21 December 2007
Tamuna and I test the DC preamp + postamp output using a pulse generator to create a 40 mV levelpulse that was 10 ns wide in order to simulate a pulse from the drift chamber proto-type.
This time we used Metalica but the results are not so different.
The bottom line appears to be that we get a x4 attenuation and not a net amplification deispite our efforts the change the configuration for the better. We also note that channels 1-11 of the postamp proto type attenuate by a factor of four but channels 12-16 have a signal independent of the input.
The voltage was changed
Operating Conditions
