Difference between revisions of "Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Electron== | ==Electron== | ||
− | == Cuts == | + | === Cuts === |
<math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> | <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> | ||
− | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | | + | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 100 px]]<br> |
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br> | Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br> | ||
Revision as of 15:44, 6 August 2007
Particle Identification
Electron
Cuts
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018.
After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.
Both cuts are applied
In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the eneregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36%