Difference between revisions of "Mlr Summ TF"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
===DC hits -vs- Solenoid === | ===DC hits -vs- Solenoid === | ||
− | With the Torus at zero Magnetic field the solenoid is | + | With the Torus at zero Magnetic field the solenoid is changed to show how Moller electrons move off the faces of R1 DC. |
====With Magnet Components==== | ====With Magnet Components==== | ||
− | [[File:ChangingRates_S1_PhiThetaHits_Full.png | | + | [[File:ChangingRates_S1_PhiThetaHits_Full.png|frame|center|alt=Moller Electron Energy vs Angle Theta in Lab Frame|'''Figure 2:''' With the Torus strength at zero Telsa, the solenoid is varied to show the Moller electrons moving off the faces of R1 in the Drift Chamber.]] |
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 22:27, 30 August 2018
VanWasshenova_Thesis#Mlr_Summ_TF
Moller Summary
Scattering Xsect
https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Converting_to_barns
Weight the E-vs-Theta plot with Xsect
![Moller Electron Energy vs Angle Theta in Lab Frame](/./images/b/be/MollerEThetaSigma_Full.png)
Figure 2: Using the theoretical differential cross section, the distribution of Moller electrons for a CM energy of approximately 53Mev can be distributed through the CM scattering angle Theta. Using Lorentz transformations, these distributions can be transformed to the lab frame. At around 60 degrees in the lab the Moller electron has an energy of close to 1 MeV. Such a low energy does not allow the Moller electron to leave the constrains of the target where they are created.
Baseline
Moller events using an lH2 target geometry No Raster
DC hits -vs- Solenoid
With the Torus at zero Magnetic field the solenoid is changed to show how Moller electrons move off the faces of R1 DC.
With Magnet Components
Without Magnet Components
With Only S1R1 DC
What are the particles in the R1S1 only plot and where are they from
Moller Electron Events(1st hits)
Photons Hits in R1
Tomography
Moller events using an dual polarized target geometry with Raster
Photon Hits in R1 when Raster size has radius of 0.2 cm
Moller rate -vs- length of a single taerget
0.5 cm radius -vs- Z
Target is a one 0.5 cm radius cylinder of length Z.
By how much does the moller rate change at full field ?