Difference between revisions of "Mlr Summ TF"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== Baseline== | == Baseline== | ||
== Moller events using an lH2 target geometry No Raster== | == Moller events using an lH2 target geometry No Raster== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===DC hits -vs- Solenoid === | ===DC hits -vs- Solenoid === | ||
Line 83: | Line 80: | ||
− | [[File: | + | |
+ | |||
+ | [[File:ComponentStudy.png]] | ||
== Moller events using an dual polarized target geometry with Raster== | == Moller events using an dual polarized target geometry with Raster== |
Revision as of 20:12, 30 August 2018
VanWasshenova_Thesis#Mlr_Summ_TF
Moller Summary
Scattering Xsect
https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Converting_to_barns
Weight the E-vs-Theta plot with Xsect
Baseline
Moller events using an lH2 target geometry No Raster
DC hits -vs- Solenoid
With the Torus at zero Magnetic field the solenoid is changes to show how moller electrons move off the faces of R1 DC.
With Magnet Components
Without Magnet Components
With Only S1R1 DC
What are the particles in the R1S1 only plot and where are they from
Moller Electron Events(1st hits)
Photons Hits in R1
Tomography
Moller events using an dual polarized target geometry with Raster
Photon Hits in R1 when Raster size has radius of 0.2 cm
Moller rate -vs- length of a single taerget
0.5 cm radius -vs- Z
Target is a one 0.5 cm radius cylinder of length Z.
By how much does the moller rate change at full field ?