Difference between revisions of "Phase space Limiting Particles"
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Since the momentum in the CM frame is a constant, this implies that pz must decrease. We can use the variable rapidity: | Since the momentum in the CM frame is a constant, this implies that pz must decrease. We can use the variable rapidity: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <center><math>y \equiv \arctan{\frac{\vec p}{E}}</math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <center><math>y \equiv \frac {1}{2} \ln \left(\frac{E+\vec p}{E-\vec p}\right)</math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<center><math>y \equiv \frac {1}{2} \ln \left(\frac{E+p_z}{E-p_z}\right)</math></center> | <center><math>y \equiv \frac {1}{2} \ln \left(\frac{E+p_z}{E-p_z}\right)</math></center> |
Revision as of 16:31, 26 July 2017
4.1.2 Phase space Limiting Particles
Since the angle phi has been constrained to remain constant, the x and y components of the momentum will increase in the positive first quadrant. This implies that the z component of the momentum must decrease by the relation:
In the Center of Mass frame, this becomes:
Since the momentum in the CM frame is a constant, this implies that pz must decrease. We can use the variable rapidity:
where
this implies that as
For forward travel in the light cone:
This corresponds to the scattered electron proven earlier.
For backward travel in the light cone:
Similarly, this corresponds to the Moller electron.
For a particle that transforms from the Lab frame to the CM frame where the particle is not within the light cone:
These particles are outside the light cone and are more timelike, thus not visible in normal space. This will reduce the number of particles that will be detected.