Difference between revisions of "Wire angle correspondance"
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
Finding the difference between wires 1 and 2, | Finding the difference between wires 1 and 2, | ||
− | <center><math>5.09^{\circ}-4.79^{\circ} \frac{1}{wire\ number}=.3^{\circ} \frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=0.005235987756\approx\ 0.00524\ \frac{radians}{wire number}</math></center> | + | <center><math>5.09^{\circ}-4.79^{\circ} \frac{1}{wire\ number}=.3^{\circ} \frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=0.005235987756\approx\ 0.00524\ \frac{radians}{wire\ number}</math></center> |
Finding the difference between wires 111 and 112, | Finding the difference between wires 111 and 112, | ||
− | <center><math>40.82^{\circ}-40.50^{\circ}=.32^{\circ} \frac{1}{wire\ number} \frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=0.005585053606\approx\ 0.00559\ \frac{radians}{wire number}</math></center> | + | <center><math>40.82^{\circ}-40.50^{\circ}=.32^{\circ} \frac{1}{wire\ number} \frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=0.005585053606\approx\ 0.00559\ \frac{radians}{wire\ number}</math></center> |
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
This sets the lower limit: | This sets the lower limit: | ||
− | <center><math>\frac{4.79^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.083601271171\ radians\approx 0.0836\ | + | <center><math>\frac{4.79^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.083601271171\ radians\approx 0.0836\ radians</math></center> |
This sets the upper limit: | This sets the upper limit: | ||
− | <center><math>\frac{40.82^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.712443400664\ radians\approx 0.712\ | + | <center><math>\frac{40.82^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.712443400664\ radians\approx 0.712\ radians</math></center> |
Taking the difference, | Taking the difference, | ||
− | <center><math>.712443400664-.083601271171\approx\ .629\ | + | <center><math>.712443400664-.083601271171\approx\ .629\ radians</math></center> |
− | Dividing by 112, we find | + | Dividing by 112 wires, we find |
− | <center><math>\frac{.628842129493}{112}=.00561466187\ radians\approx\ 0.00561\ radians</math></center> | + | <center><math>\frac{.628842129493}{112}\frac{radians}{wire\ number}=.00561466187\ \frac{radians}{wire\ number}\approx\ 0.00561\ \frac{radians}{wire\ number}</math></center> |
===Changing cell size=== | ===Changing cell size=== |
Revision as of 18:14, 28 November 2016
Determining wire-theta correspondance
To associate the hits with the Moller scattering angle theta, the occupancy plots of the drift chamber hits by means of wire numbers and layer must be translated using the physical constraints of the detector. Using the data released for the DC:
DC: Drift Chambers(specs)
This gives the detector with a working range of 5 to 40 degrees in Theta for the lab frame, with a resolution of 1m radian.
This sets the lower limit:
This sets the upper limit:
Taking the difference,
Dividing by 112, we find
CED Verification
Using CED to verify the angle and wire correlation,
Zooming in on the view paralell to the direction of the wires in ced, we can examine the wire corresponding theta angle in the drift chamber.
Corresponding theta angles can be found for other wires, in Region 1, Superlayers 1 and 2.
Wire Number | Layer 1 | Layer 2 | Layer 3 | Layer 4 | Layer 5 | Layer 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4.79 | 5.03 | 4.98 | 5.22 | 5.16 | 5.40 |
2 | 5.09 | 5.33 | 5.27 | 5.51 | 5.45 | 5.69 |
78 | 29.79 | 29.93 | 29.74 | 29.88 | 29.69 | 29.83 |
111 | 40.50 | 40.59 | 40.36 | 40.44 | 40.21 | 40.29 |
112 | 40.82 | 40.90 | 40.67 | 40.75 | 40.52 | 40.60 |
Wire Number | Layer 1 | Layer 2 | Layer 3 | Layer 4 | Layer 5 | Layer 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4.79 | 5.03 | 4.98 | 5.22 | 5.16 | 5.40 |
2 | 5.09 | 5.33 | 5.27 | 5.51 | 5.45 | 5.69 |
78 | 29.79 | 29.93 | 29.74 | 29.88 | 29.70 | 29.84 |
111 | 40.51 | 40.59 | 40.36 | 40.44 | 40.22 | 40.30 |
112 | 40.82 | 40.90 | 40.67 | 40.75 | 40.52 | 40.60 |
Super Layer 1:Layer 1
Finding the difference between wires 1 and 2,
Finding the difference between wires 111 and 112,
Examing the range limits for the angle theta:
This sets the lower limit:
This sets the upper limit:
Taking the difference,
Dividing by 112 wires, we find