Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Osc HookesLaw"
(Created page with " Forest_UCM_Osc#Hooke.27s_Law") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Hooke's Law | ||
+ | =Derivation= | ||
+ | ==Equation of Motion from Cons of Energy== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the previous chapter we saw how the equations of motion could from the requirement that Energy be conserved. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : <math>E = T + U</math> | ||
+ | :<math> T = E - U</math> | ||
+ | :<math> \frac{1}{2} m v^2 = E- U</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | in 1-D | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math> \dot {x}^2 = \frac{2}{m} \left ( E-U(x) \right )</math> | ||
+ | :<math> \dot {x}^2= \frac{2}{m} \left ( E-U(x) \right )</math> | ||
+ | :<math> \dot {x}= \sqrt{\frac{2}{m} \left ( E-U(x) \right )}</math> | ||
+ | :<math> \frac{dx}{dt}= \sqrt{\frac{2}{m} \left ( E-U(x) \right )}</math> | ||
+ | :<math> \frac{dx}{ \sqrt{\frac{2}{m} \left ( E-U(x) \right )}}=dt</math> | ||
+ | :<math> \sqrt{\frac{m}{2}} \int \frac{dx}{ \sqrt{\left ( E-U(x) \right )}}=\int dt</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Let consider the case where an object is oscillating about a point of stability <math>(x_0)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | A Taylor expansion of the Potential function U(x) about the equalibrium point <math>(x_0)</math> is | ||
+ | |||
+ | : <math>U(x) = U(x_0) \; + \; \left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0) \; + \; \frac{1}{2!}\left . \frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial x^2} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^2 \; + \; \frac{1}{3!}\left . \frac{\partial^3 U}{\partial x^3} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^3 \; + \dots </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Further consider the case the the potential is symmetric about the equalibrium point <math>(x_0)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | at the equalibrium point | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: Force = 0 at equilibrium | ||
+ | |||
+ | also the odd (2n-1) terms must be zero in order to habe stable equalibrium ( if the curvature is negative then the inflection is directed downward towards possibly towards another minima). | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial^{2n-1} U}{\partial x^{2n-1}} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: no negative inflection | ||
+ | |||
+ | and the leading term is just a constant which can be dropped by redefining the zero point of the potential | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>U(x_0) = 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This leaves us with | ||
+ | |||
+ | : <math>U(x) = \frac{1}{2!}\left . \frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial x^2} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^2 \; + \; \frac{1}{4!}\left . \frac{\partial^4 U}{\partial x^4} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^4 \; + \dots </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Interpretation (Hooke's law= | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Force exerted by a spring is proportional to the spring displacement from equilibrium and is directed towards restoring the equilibrium condition. (a linear restoring force). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In 1-D this force may be written as | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>F = - kx</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Is this a conservative force? | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1.) The force only depends on position. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2.) The work done is independent of path ( <math>\vec \nabla \times \vec F = 0</math> in 1-D and 3-D) | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Potential= | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>U = - \int \vec F \cdot \vec r = - \int (-kx) dx = \frac{1}{2} k x^2</math> | ||
[[Forest_UCM_Osc#Hooke.27s_Law]] | [[Forest_UCM_Osc#Hooke.27s_Law]] |
Revision as of 12:02, 1 October 2014
Hooke's Law
Derivation
Equation of Motion from Cons of Energy
In the previous chapter we saw how the equations of motion could from the requirement that Energy be conserved.
in 1-D
Let consider the case where an object is oscillating about a point of stability
A Taylor expansion of the Potential function U(x) about the equalibrium point
is
Further consider the case the the potential is symmetric about the equalibrium point
at the equalibrium point
- : Force = 0 at equilibrium
also the odd (2n-1) terms must be zero in order to habe stable equalibrium ( if the curvature is negative then the inflection is directed downward towards possibly towards another minima).
- : no negative inflection
and the leading term is just a constant which can be dropped by redefining the zero point of the potential
This leaves us with
Interpretation (Hooke's law
The Force exerted by a spring is proportional to the spring displacement from equilibrium and is directed towards restoring the equilibrium condition. (a linear restoring force).
In 1-D this force may be written as
Is this a conservative force?
1.) The force only depends on position.
2.) The work done is independent of path (
in 1-D and 3-D)