Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Osc"
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
at the equalibrium point | at the equalibrium point | ||
− | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0}</math>: Force = 0 at equilibrium | + | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: Force = 0 at equilibrium |
+ | |||
+ | also the odd terms must be zero in order to habe stable equalibrium ( if the curvature is negative then the inflection is directed downward towards possibly towards another minima). | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial^{2n-1} U}{\partial x^{2n-1}} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: no negative inflection | ||
==Interpretation (Hooke's law== | ==Interpretation (Hooke's law== |
Revision as of 11:58, 1 October 2014
Hooke's Law
Derivation
In the previous chapter we saw how the equations of motion could from the requirement that Energy be conserved.
in 1-D
Let consider the case where an object is oscillating about a point of stability
A Taylor expansion of the Potential function U(x) about the equalibrium point
is
Further consider the case the the potential is symmetric about the equalibrium point
at the equalibrium point
- : Force = 0 at equilibrium
also the odd terms must be zero in order to habe stable equalibrium ( if the curvature is negative then the inflection is directed downward towards possibly towards another minima).
- : no negative inflection
Interpretation (Hooke's law
The Force exerted by a spring is proportional to the spring displacement from equilibrium and is directed towards restoring the equilibrium condition. (a linear restoring force).
In 1-D this force may be written as
Is this a conservative force?
1.) The force only depends on position.
2.) The work done is independent of path (
in 1-D and 3-D)