Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Energy CurlFcons"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
=Stokes Theorem=
 
=Stokes Theorem=
  
Stokes theorem related the line integral of a vecotr field over its boundary
+
Stokes theorem related the line integral of a vector field over its closed boundary
  
 
:<math>\oint \vec F \cdot d \vec r</math>
 
:<math>\oint \vec F \cdot d \vec r</math>
 +
;(the circle around the integral indicates a closed path , you goes to some point and then back)
  
 
to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over a surface
 
to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over a surface

Revision as of 02:44, 24 September 2014

A force with a curl of zero is a conservative force.

Thus taking the curl of the force is an easier way to test for conservative forces rather than calculating the work and inspecting to see if it only depends on the endpoints of the motion.

Definition of curl

We have seen that the gradient operator is defined in cartesian coordinates as

[math]\vec \nabla = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \hat i +\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \hat j +\frac{\partial}{\partial z} \hat k[/math]

can be used to find the function form of a conservative force given its potential energy

Stokes Theorem

Stokes theorem related the line integral of a vector field over its closed boundary

[math]\oint \vec F \cdot d \vec r[/math]
(the circle around the integral indicates a closed path , you goes to some point and then back)

to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over a surface

[math]\iint \vec \nabla \times \vec F dA[/math]


Forest_UCM_Energy#Second_requirement_for_Conservative_Force