Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Energy CurlFcons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Stokes theorem related the line integral of a vecotr field over its boundary | Stokes theorem related the line integral of a vecotr field over its boundary | ||
− | :<math>\ | + | :<math>\oint \vec F \cdot d \vec r</math> |
to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over a surface | to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over a surface | ||
− | :<math>\ | + | :<math>\iint \ve \nabla \times \vec F dA</math> |
[[Forest_UCM_Energy#Second_requirement_for_Conservative_Force]] | [[Forest_UCM_Energy#Second_requirement_for_Conservative_Force]] |
Revision as of 02:41, 24 September 2014
A force with a curl of zero is a conservative force.
Thus taking the curl of the force is an easier way to test for conservative forces rather than calculating the work and inspecting to see if it only depends on the endpoints of the motion.
Definition of curl
We have seen that the gradient operator is defined in cartesian coordinates as
can be used to find the function form of a conservative force given its potential energy
Stokes Theorem
Stokes theorem related the line integral of a vecotr field over its boundary
to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over a surface