Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Energy CurlFcons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " A force with a curl of zero is a conservative force. Thus taking the curl of the force is an easier way to test for conservative forces rather than calculating the work and ins…") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
A force with a curl of zero is a conservative force. | A force with a curl of zero is a conservative force. | ||
Thus taking the curl of the force is an easier way to test for conservative forces rather than calculating the work and inspecting to see if it only depends on the endpoints of the motion. | Thus taking the curl of the force is an easier way to test for conservative forces rather than calculating the work and inspecting to see if it only depends on the endpoints of the motion. | ||
| + | =Definition of curl= | ||
| + | |||
| + | W have seen that the garden operator is defined in cartesian coordinates as | ||
| + | :<math>\vec \nambla = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \hat i +\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \hat i +\frac{\partial}{\partial z} \hat i</math> | ||
[[Forest_UCM_Energy#Second_requirement_for_Conservative_Force]] | [[Forest_UCM_Energy#Second_requirement_for_Conservative_Force]] | ||
Revision as of 22:17, 23 September 2014
A force with a curl of zero is a conservative force.
Thus taking the curl of the force is an easier way to test for conservative forces rather than calculating the work and inspecting to see if it only depends on the endpoints of the motion.
Definition of curl
W have seen that the garden operator is defined in cartesian coordinates as