Difference between revisions of "Bull"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Do you think it is real that electron can be simultaneously in several places, like QM told to us? | *Do you think it is real that electron can be simultaneously in several places, like QM told to us? | ||
| − | *Do we really understand why electron radiate when it orbits around | + | *Do we really understand why electron does not radiate when it orbits around the atomic nuclei? |
*Do we really understand why the low of classical electrodynamics does not apply to atom? | *Do we really understand why the low of classical electrodynamics does not apply to atom? | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 22 May 2013
- Do you think it is real that electron can be simultaneously in several places, like QM told to us?
- Do we really understand why electron does not radiate when it orbits around the atomic nuclei?
- Do we really understand why the low of classical electrodynamics does not apply to atom?
- Will electron radiate when it travel in curved space-time?
wave function?
- QM interpretation: w.f. describes the particle (probability to find the particles in certain place and certain time etc...)
- Bayesian interpretation: w.f. describes the incomplete information about the particle
measurements
The all troubles in physics comes because people talk in different languages (Tower of Babel)
- - phenomenon, nature;
- x - noise
- y - measurement
physics law
There is no physics in nature, when people come the physics come then
Nature -> measurements (done by people) -> information -> physics