Difference between revisions of "QW Mayers2009Sim"
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
− | BFIL decrease (%) BFIL factor f_ep A*yield pi/ep |A_pi| (ppm) |A_ep| (ppm) |A_m| (ppm) dA_pi/A_pi (%) |dA_pi| (ppm) | + | {| border="1" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 |
− | 15 0.8840 0.934 0.667 2.412 0.254 0.336 42.1 1.02 | + | |- |
− | 16 0.8800 0.930 0.714 2.329 0.244 0.331 41.0 0.96 | + | |BFIL decrease (%) || BFIL factor|| f_ep A*yield ||pi/ep|| |A_pi| (ppm) |||A_ep| (ppm) |||A_m| (ppm) ||dA_pi/A_pi (%) |||dA_pi| (ppm) |
− | 17 0.8632 0.897 1.144 2.354 0.236 0.386 28.9 0.68 | + | |- |
− | 18 0.8528 0.872 1.459 2.316 0.236 0.425 24.2 0.56 | + | |15|| 0.8840 ||0.934 ||0.667 ||2.412 ||0.254 ||0.336 ||42.1 ||1.02 |
− | 19 0.8424 0.850 1.783 2.304 0.229 0.460 21.2 0.49 | + | |- |
− | 20 0.8320 0.823 2.171 2.289 0.227 0.504 18.4 0.42 | + | |16 ||0.8800 ||0.930 ||0.714 ||2.329 ||0.244 ||0.331 ||41.0 ||0.96 |
− | 25 0.7800 0.714 4.082 2.189 0.215 0.663 12.9 0.28 | + | |- |
− | 27 0.7590 0.702 4.352 2.151 0.210 0.671 12.8 0.27 | + | |17 ||0.8632 ||0.897 ||1.144 ||2.354 ||0.236 ||0.386 ||28.9 ||0.68 |
− | 28 0.7490 0.682 4.739 2.145 0.211 0.701 12.5 0.27 | + | |- |
− | 29 0.7384 0.686 4.677 2.134 0.209 0.691 12.8 0.27 | + | |18 ||0.8528 ||0.872 ||1.459 ||2.316 ||0.236 ||0.425 ||24.2 ||0.56 |
− | 30 0.7280 0.684 4.735 2.106 0.206 0.686 13.2 0.28 | + | |- |
+ | |19 ||0.8424 ||0.850 ||1.783 ||2.304 ||0.229 ||0.460 ||21.2 ||0.49 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |20 ||0.8320 ||0.823 ||2.171 ||2.289 ||0.227 ||0.504 ||18.4 ||0.42 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |25 ||0.7800 ||0.714 ||4.082 ||2.189 ||0.215 ||0.663 ||12.9 ||0.28 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |27 ||0.7590 ||0.702 ||4.352 ||2.151 ||0.210 ||0.671 ||12.8 ||0.27 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |28 ||0.7490 ||0.682 ||4.739 ||2.145 ||0.211 ||0.701 ||12.5 ||0.27 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |29 ||0.7384 ||0.686 ||4.677 ||2.134 ||0.209 ||0.691 ||12.8 ||0.27 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |30 ||0.7280 ||0.684 ||4.735 ||2.106 ||0.206 ||0.686 ||13.2 ||0.28 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} |
Latest revision as of 18:00, 22 July 2011
Updated October 6, 2009
Triggered 1,000,000 elastic and inelastic primary events in Geant3 for different BFIL's. The Cerenkov bar for each case was located with a radial coverage X=319-337 cm, and the nominal BFIL factor is 1.04. The geometry version used was v2.11a.
Quick side note: even when generating "primary" events in the simulation, there are some events that minimally interact with the shileding wall aperture and lose energy. They "come from the target" but I do not consider them pure primary events. Therefore, I place a cut on the energy_in at the detector to eliminate these events. To determine this cut, I look at a plot of en_in and en_in versus en_o, which makes it clear what events interacted with a wall. The cut must be at least en_in>200. Typically, the cut is made higher, but this does not have a large impact on the results (at least within the uncertainty based on the statistcs). For the following cases, an energy cut of en_in>600 was used.
Here are some tables with the output from the simulation and calculated f, A_ep, A_pi, dA_pi/A_pi_stat (assuming 3.5 beam days, P = 0.85). The rates listed are for one octant. The average Q^2 of the inelastic events is ~0.022-0.025 GeV^2 (see example distribution for a 25% decrease in BFIL):
The equations used and an example calculation using the 17% BFIL decrease values can be found here: link.
BFIL decrease (%) | BFIL factor | ep yield (MHz) | ep A*yield (ppm*MHz) | pi yield (MHz) | pi A*yield (ppm*MHz) | % W>1232 (%) |
15 | 0.8840 | 121.11 | -30.77 | 8.51 | -20.52 | < 0.05 |
16 | 0.8800 | 120.89 | -29.54 | 9.05 | -21.07 | < 0.05 |
17 | 0.8632 | 105.32 | -24.85 | 12.08 | -28.44 | 0.11 |
18 | 0.8528 | 96.80 | -22.58 | 14.22 | -32.94 | 0.23 |
19 | 0.8424 | 90.61 | -20.74 | 16.05 | -36.98 | 0.36 |
20 | 0.8320 | 84.57 | -19.20 | 18.22 | -41.70 | 0.60 |
25 | 0.7800 | 62.44 | -13.41 | 25.02 | -54.75 | 7.2 |
27 | 0.7590 | 59.93 | -12.60 | 25.49 | -54.84 | 16.1 |
28 | 0.7490 | 53.70 | -11.32 | 25.00 | -53.62 | 21.3 |
29 | 0.7384 | 53.30 | -11.13 | 24.49 | -52.04 | 28.3 |
30 | 0.7280 | 50.86 | -10.46 | 23.51 | -49.52 | 35.0 |
BFIL decrease (%) | BFIL factor | f_ep A*yield | pi/ep | A_pi| (ppm) | A_ep| (ppm) | A_m| (ppm) | dA_pi/A_pi (%) | dA_pi| (ppm) |
15 | 0.8840 | 0.934 | 0.667 | 2.412 | 0.254 | 0.336 | 42.1 | 1.02 |
16 | 0.8800 | 0.930 | 0.714 | 2.329 | 0.244 | 0.331 | 41.0 | 0.96 |
17 | 0.8632 | 0.897 | 1.144 | 2.354 | 0.236 | 0.386 | 28.9 | 0.68 |
18 | 0.8528 | 0.872 | 1.459 | 2.316 | 0.236 | 0.425 | 24.2 | 0.56 |
19 | 0.8424 | 0.850 | 1.783 | 2.304 | 0.229 | 0.460 | 21.2 | 0.49 |
20 | 0.8320 | 0.823 | 2.171 | 2.289 | 0.227 | 0.504 | 18.4 | 0.42 |
25 | 0.7800 | 0.714 | 4.082 | 2.189 | 0.215 | 0.663 | 12.9 | 0.28 |
27 | 0.7590 | 0.702 | 4.352 | 2.151 | 0.210 | 0.671 | 12.8 | 0.27 |
28 | 0.7490 | 0.682 | 4.739 | 2.145 | 0.211 | 0.701 | 12.5 | 0.27 |
29 | 0.7384 | 0.686 | 4.677 | 2.134 | 0.209 | 0.691 | 12.8 | 0.27 |
30 | 0.7280 | 0.684 | 4.735 | 2.106 | 0.206 | 0.686 | 13.2 | 0.28 |