HRRL 03-17-2011: Difference between revisions

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Setisadi (talk | contribs)
Setisadi (talk | contribs)
Line 84: Line 84:
parabola fit for x-projection:  
parabola fit for x-projection:  
   
   
In m unit
parabola fit for y-projection (y in mm unit):


y = 3.69167*10^(-6) -3.89000*x*10^(-6) + 4.79738*x.*x*10^(-6)
y = (3.69167 +-0.02346) + (-3.89000+-0.12250)*x + (4.79738+-0.13309)*x.*x  
 
In mm unit
 
y = 3.69167 -3.89000*x + 4.79738*x.*x  


Data created from parabola fit
Data created from parabola fit
Line 113: Line 110:




parabola fit for y-projection:  
parabola fit for y-projection (y in mm unit):  
 
y = (2.81806 +-0.03890) + (0.52202+-0.26284)*x + (2.35025+-0.34553)*x.*x
 
Data created from parabola fit
 
[[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_data_from_fit_y.txt]]
 
 
 
X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of  X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur.
 
 
 


In m unit:


y = 2.81806*10^(-6) + 0.52202*x*10^(-6) + 2.35025*x.*x*10^(-6)


In mm unit:


y = 2.81806 + 0.52202*x + 2.35025*x.*x


Data created from parabola fit


[[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_data_from_fit_y.txt]]






X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of  X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur.


=== 20 mA, Positive Current, X projection ===
=== 20 mA, Positive Current, X projection ===

Revision as of 17:53, 17 May 2011

Accelerator Tuning

Good Tune Used for good Scan

By Dr. Kim

Solenoid 1 6.8 A
Solenoid 2 10.4 A
Gun Ver -0.2 A
Gun Hor +0.4 A
Output Hor -1.4A
Output Ver -0.5 A
Gun HV +9.75 (Knob Setting)
Gun Grid Voltage 5.25 (Knob Setting)
RF frequency 2855.816 MHz
Modulator HV Power Supply 4.42 (Knob Setting)
RF macro Pulse Length (FWHM) 200 ns
Peak Current on FC 37.2 mAmps
Scope on FC
e- Beam Energy 14 MeV



Calibration

image OTR image cal_h (mm/px) cal_v (mm/px)
0.04308 0.04204
0.04320 0.04228
0.04349 0.04181
0.04323 0.04196
0.04337 0.04212
mean (mm/px) mean (mm/px)
[math]\displaystyle{ 0.04327 \pm 0.00016 }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ 0.04204 \pm 0.00018 }[/math]


Results

Q1

At lower current background subtraction gets worse, because singal/noise drops.

42 mA, Positive Current, X projection

emit=0.388 +- 0.008 mm*mrad, emit_norm=10.64 +- 0.22 mm*mrad

beta=1.285 +- 0.024, alpha=0.94 +-0.03


//K1*L(1/m)   er K1*L    sgima^2(mm)   er sigma^2

Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt


parabola fit for x-projection:

parabola fit for y-projection (y in mm unit):

y = (3.69167 +-0.02346) + (-3.89000+-0.12250)*x + (4.79738+-0.13309)*x.*x


Data created from parabola fit

Media:2011_Mar_Emit_data_from_fit_x.txt



42 mA, Negative Current, Y projection

emit=0.266 +- 0.018 mm*mrad, emit_norm=7.30 +- 0.50 mm*mrad

beta=0.918 +- 0.068, alpha=0.19 +-0.06


//K1*L(1/m)   er K1*L    sgima^2(mm)   er sigma^2

Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_y.txt


parabola fit for y-projection (y in mm unit):

y = (2.81806 +-0.03890) + (0.52202+-0.26284)*x + (2.35025+-0.34553)*x.*x

Data created from parabola fit

Media:2011_Mar_Emit_data_from_fit_y.txt


X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur.







20 mA, Positive Current, X projection



10 mA, Positive Current, X projection


5 mA, Positive Current, X projection


Q4

42 mA All Other Quads off

Haven't reach minimum.

42 mA Q1_at_-2A, Q2_at_+8A, Q3_at_-6A

x-projection:


y-projection:


HRRL_Emittance_Measurements_March14-18-2011