Difference between revisions of "HRRL 03-17-2011"
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
parabola fit for y-projection: | parabola fit for y-projection: | ||
| − | y = 2.81806*10^6 + 0.52202*x*10^6 + 2.35025*x.*x*10^6 | + | y = 2.81806*10^(-6) + 0.52202*x*10^(-6) + 2.35025*x.*x*10^(-6) |
[[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_Y.png | 300 px]] | [[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_Y.png | 300 px]] | ||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur. | X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=== 20 mA, Positive Current, X projection === | === 20 mA, Positive Current, X projection === | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 17 May 2011
Accelerator Tuning
Good Tune Used for good Scan
By Dr. Kim
| Solenoid 1 | 6.8 A |
| Solenoid 2 | 10.4 A |
| Gun Ver | -0.2 A |
| Gun Hor | +0.4 A |
| Output Hor | -1.4A |
| Output Ver | -0.5 A |
| Gun HV | +9.75 (Knob Setting) |
| Gun Grid Voltage | 5.25 (Knob Setting) |
| RF frequency | 2855.816 MHz |
| Modulator HV Power Supply | 4.42 (Knob Setting) |
| RF macro Pulse Length (FWHM) | 200 ns |
| Peak Current on FC | 37.2 mAmps |
| Scope on FC | 
|
| e- Beam Energy | 14 MeV
|
Calibration
| image | OTR image | cal_h (mm/px) | cal_v (mm/px) |
 |
 |
0.04308 | 0.04204 |
 |
 |
0.04320 | 0.04228 |
 |
 |
0.04349 | 0.04181 |
 |
 |
0.04323 | 0.04196 |
 |
 |
0.04337 | 0.04212 |
| mean (mm/px) | mean (mm/px) | ||
Results
Q1
At lower current background subtraction gets worse, because singal/noise drops.
42 mA, Positive Current, X projection
emit=0.388 +- 0.008 mm*mrad, emit_norm=10.64 +- 0.22 mm*mrad
beta=1.285 +- 0.024, alpha=0.94 +-0.03
parabola fit for x-projection:
y = 3.69167*10^(-6) -3.89000*x*10^(-6) + 4.79738*x.*x*10^(-6)
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2
Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt
42 mA, Negative Current, Y projection
emit=0.266 +- 0.018 mm*mrad, emit_norm=7.30 +- 0.50 mm*mrad
beta=0.918 +- 0.068, alpha=0.19 +-0.06
parabola fit for y-projection:
y = 2.81806*10^(-6) + 0.52202*x*10^(-6) + 2.35025*x.*x*10^(-6)
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2
Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_y.txt
X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur.
20 mA, Positive Current, X projection
10 mA, Positive Current, X projection
5 mA, Positive Current, X projection
Q4
42 mA All Other Quads off
Haven't reach minimum.
42 mA Q1_at_-2A, Q2_at_+8A, Q3_at_-6A
x-projection:
y-projection: