HRRL 03-17-2011: Difference between revisions
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
[[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_X.png | 300 px]] | [[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_X.png | 300 px]] | ||
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2 | |||
[[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt]] | [[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt]] | ||
| Line 84: | Line 86: | ||
[[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_Y.png | 300 px]] | [[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_Y.png | 300 px]] | ||
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2 | |||
[[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_y.txt]] | |||
Revision as of 18:17, 16 May 2011
Accelerator Tuning
Good Tune Used for good Scan
By Dr. Kim
Calibration
Results
Q1
At lower current background subtraction gets worse, because singal/noise drops.
42 mA, Positive Current, X projection
emit=0.388 +- 0.008 mm*mrad, emit_norm=10.64 +- 0.22 mm*mrad
beta=1.285 +- 0.024, alpha=0.94 +-0.03
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2
Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt
42 mA, Negative Current, Y projection
emit=0.266 +- 0.018 mm*mrad, emit_norm=7.30 +- 0.50 mm*mrad
beta=0.918 +- 0.068, alpha=0.19 +-0.06
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2
Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_y.txt
X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur.
20 mA, Positive Current, X projection
10 mA, Positive Current, X projection
5 mA, Positive Current, X projection
Q4
42 mA All Other Quads off
Haven't reach minimum.
42 mA Q1_at_-2A, Q2_at_+8A, Q3_at_-6A
x-projection:
y-projection: