Difference between revisions of "Counts Rate (44 MeV LINAC)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
==steps together...== | ==steps together...== | ||
− | <math>8.2 \cdot 10^{7} \frac{\gamma}{sec} \times 130\ mb \times 0.48\cdot 10^{23}\ \frac{atoms}{cm^2} \times 2.4 = 1.2 \cdot 10^{6}\ \frac{neutrons}{sec}</math><br><br> | + | |
+ | <math>Y = \frac{\gamma}{sec} \times t \times \sigma \times \2.4 =</math><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>= 8.2 \cdot 10^{7} \frac{\gamma}{sec} \times 130\ mb \times 0.48\cdot 10^{23}\ \frac{atoms}{cm^2} \times 2.4 = 1.2 \cdot 10^{6}\ \frac{neutrons}{sec}</math><br><br> | ||
Revision as of 04:54, 18 May 2010
LINAC parameters used in calculations
1) pulse width 50 ns
2) pulse current 50 A
3) repetition rate 300 Hz
4) energy 44 MeV
Number of electrons/sec on radiator
Number of photons/sec from radiator
bremsstrahlung
in (10,20) MeV region we have about
0.1 photons/electrons/MeV/r.l
radiation length
r.l.(Ti) = 3.59 cm
radiator thickness = 12.5
steps together...
Collimation factor
Collimation factor is
4-6 % of total # of photons (Alex, GEANT calculation)
then, incident flux on target is
Number of neutrons/sec (yields)
photonuclear cross section for
in (10,20) MeV region the average cross section is:
130 mb
target thickness,
Target thickness = 1 cm:
neutrons per fission
2.4 neutrons/fission
steps together...
Worst Case Isotropic Neutrons
Let's say we have:
radius detector = 1 cm
1 meter away
fractional solid angle =
<= geometrical acceptancefinally we have
Therefore, this experiment is really doable.