Difference between revisions of "PhotoFissionOctoberAnalysis"
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
10.) What improvement in beam is needed | 10.) What improvement in beam is needed | ||
| + | |||
| + | 11.) FFT of N ToF | ||
[http://www.iac.isu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/October_Fission_HRRL_Measurements_2008 Go back] | [http://www.iac.isu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/October_Fission_HRRL_Measurements_2008 Go back] | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 28 October 2008
10/28/08
Tasks:
1.) Run Tables (Alex)
2.) ASCII file generation Sam)
3.) TDC -> time -> Neutron Energy calibration (Sadiq)
4.) Reproducibility tests (Dale, Alex)
a.) Gamma & Neutron rate change
b.)NaI/Ref -vs run number and Target (Wheres de photons)
c.) Asym the same between detectors in same run and same detector in different runs
5.) Threshold match procedure (Tony)
Did the unpolarized runs on the last day have matched thresholds?
Compare Asym in single run to asym when detectors swapped
6.) H20,C,Si,Pb,N(,n), X-sections Neutron producers? (jason, Ariel, Sam)
Black lead shot collimator increased neutron flux by factor 2?
7.) Origin curve Fitting (Valeriia)
8.) U rate estimate (Dale)
9.) Asym -vs TDC (MeV)
10.) What improvement in beam is needed
11.) FFT of N ToF