Difference between revisions of "Notes from July 2nd, 2008 Meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<math> 10^{4} \frac{photodisintegrations}{sec} \times \frac{1}{4} \cdot 10^{-4} \times 10^{-1} = .025 \frac{events}{sec}</math> | <math> 10^{4} \frac{photodisintegrations}{sec} \times \frac{1}{4} \cdot 10^{-4} \times 10^{-1} = .025 \frac{events}{sec}</math> | ||
− | + | ::::::::::::::::::<math>\uparrow</math><math>\uparrow</math> | |
− | |||
− | |||
+ | :::::::::::::::::geometry[[User:Daq|Daq]] 07:53, 3 July 2008 (MDT)efficiency | ||
− | time for 10 | + | |
− | + | time for <math>10^{4}</math> events = 100 hours for 1% | |
− | + | ::::24 hours for 2% | |
+ | ::::6 hours for 4% | ||
Therefore, this experiment is do able. | Therefore, this experiment is do able. |
Revision as of 13:53, 3 July 2008
Numbers for rate of Brems intensity spectrum:
=
Number of ɣ + d -> n + p events/sec
Probability of Photodisintegration Event
target thickness in
Worst Case Isotropic Neutrons
Let's say we have:
radius detector = 1 cm
1 meter away
fractional solid angle =
<= geometrical acceptance10 \degree efficient of n \degree detection
- geometryDaq 07:53, 3 July 2008 (MDT)efficiency
time for events = 100 hours for 1%
- 24 hours for 2%
- 6 hours for 4%
Therefore, this experiment is do able.