Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
| [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-15.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-17.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-19.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-21.gif|200px]] || | | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-15.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-17.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-19.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-21.gif|200px]] || | ||
[[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-23.gif|200px]] | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-23.gif|200px]] | ||
+ | |}<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {| border="1" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1.24<W<1.26 || 1.26<W<1.28 || 1.28<W<1.3 || 1.3<W<1.32 || 1.32<W<1.34 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-25.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-27.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-29.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-31.gif|200px]] || | ||
+ | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-33.gif|200px]] | ||
|}<br> | |}<br> | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 24 July 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
- Electron Momentum vs EC_total
- Missing Mass
- vs
Phi lab
The angle is (0, 360).
electron sector | after correction | ||
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 |
Phi CM
The phi angle after rotation and transformation to the CM frame
electron sector | ||
1 | ||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 |
Correlation plots with , and
The angle is (0, 360).
vs | vs | vs |
Same table as above but with the cut 1.0 < W < 1.5
vs | vs | vs |
Same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.25 GeV , 20 MeV bins in W and 15 degree bins in
vs | vs | vs |
Same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.5 GeV and -0.2 <
< 0vs | vs | vs |
Insert the same table as above but with the cuts 1.15 < W < 1.25 GeV and -0.1 << 0, 20 MeV bins in W and 15 degree bins in
vs | vs | vs |
Insert the same table as above but with the cuts W < 1.25 GeV and -0.1 << 0, 20 MeV bins in W and 15 degree bins in
vs | vs | vs |
Phi_angle_in_CM_Frame for different cuts
Used 1735 files. The following cuts are applied:
Insert plot of M_x and W to show cuts
Then insert phi -vs- theta
Cuts: EC_inner>0.06, EC_tot/p>0.2, nphe>2.5,
[3]
Cuts: EC_inner>0.06, EC_tot/p>0.2, nphe>2.5, , and .
[4]
cos_theta_pion_CM_Frame_vs_Phi_angle_in_CM_Frame for different W(missing mass) cuts
1.14<W<1.16 | 1.16<W<1.18 | 1.18<W<1.2 | 1.2<W<1.22 | 1.22<W<1.24 |
1.24<W<1.26 | 1.26<W<1.28 | 1.28<W<1.3 | 1.3<W<1.32 | 1.32<W<1.34 |
Phi_angle_in_CM_Frame for 1.44<W<1.46