Phi angle in CM frame for different runs: Difference between revisions

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Oborn (talk | contribs)
Oborn (talk | contribs)
Line 41: Line 41:


=<math>\varphi^{CM}</math>=
=<math>\varphi^{CM}</math>=
==The phi angle after rotation and transformation to the CM frame==
{| border="1"  |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0
|-
| electron sector  || <math>\varphi_{e}^{CM}</math> || <math>\varphi_{pion}^{CM}</math> 
|-
| 1 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_1_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_1_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 2 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_2_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_2_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 3 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_3_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_3_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 4 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_4_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_4_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 5 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_5_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_5_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 6 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_6_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_6_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
|}<br>
== Correlation plots with<math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} , W</math> , and <math>  Q^2</math> ==
The angle is (0, 360).<br>
The angle is (0, 360).<br>
;
;
Line 85: Line 109:


[[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_All_sectors_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|400px]] <br>
[[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_All_sectors_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|400px]] <br>
{| border="1"  |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0
|-
| electron sector  || <math>\varphi_{e}^{CM}</math> || <math>\varphi_{pion}^{CM}</math> 
|-
| 1 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_1_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_1_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 2 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_2_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_2_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 3 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_3_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_3_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 4 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_4_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_4_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 5 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_5_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_5_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
| 6 || [[Image:electron_phi_angle_for_sector_6_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]] || [[Image:pion_phi_angle_for_sector_6_in_CM_frame_27095.gif|300px]]
|-
|}<br>





Revision as of 10:09, 25 June 2008

EC_total, [math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math], missing mass, [math]\displaystyle{ \theta_{e} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{e} }[/math]

Electron Momentum vs EC_total


Missing Mass

[math]\displaystyle{ \theta_{e}^{LAB} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{e}^{LAB} }[/math]



[1]

[math]\displaystyle{ \varphi^{LAB} }[/math]

The angle is (0, 360).


electron sector [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi_{e}^{LAB} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi_{pion}^{LAB} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi_{e}^{LAB} - \varphi_{pion}^{LAB} }[/math] after correction
1
2
3
4
5
6


[math]\displaystyle{ \varphi^{CM} }[/math]

The phi angle after rotation and transformation to the CM frame

electron sector [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi_{e}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi_{pion}^{CM} }[/math]
1
2
3
4
5
6


Correlation plots with[math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} , W }[/math] , and [math]\displaystyle{ Q^2 }[/math]

The angle is (0, 360).

[math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ W }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ Q^2 }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math]



Same table as above but with the cut 1.0 < W < 1.5

[math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ W }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ Q^2 }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math]


Insert the same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.25 GeV 
[math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ W }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ Q^2 }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math]


Same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.5 GeV and -0.2 < [math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] < 0

[math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ W }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ Q^2 }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{diff}^{CM} }[/math]



I have applied the cut only on [math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math]: 0.4 < [math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] < 0.6.(I know it does not look as good as it should be.)






[Back to Analysis]