Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
|[[Image:pion_cos_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_Wlt1.5_ct-0.1.gif|300px]] || [[Image:missing_mass_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.5_ct-0.1.gif|300px]] || [[Image:Q_sqrd_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.5_ct-0.1.gif|300px]] | |[[Image:pion_cos_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_Wlt1.5_ct-0.1.gif|300px]] || [[Image:missing_mass_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.5_ct-0.1.gif|300px]] || [[Image:Q_sqrd_vs_phi_angle_cm_frame_Wlt1.5_ct-0.1.gif|300px]] | ||
|}<br> | |}<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Dr. Forest, I have applied the cut only on <math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math>: 0.4 < <math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math> < 0.6.(I know it does not look as good as it should be.)<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:phi_angle_diff_in_cm_frame_cut_on_costheta_0_4-0_6.gif|500px]] | ||
Revision as of 01:12, 25 June 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
- Electron Momentum vs EC_total
- Missing Mass
- vs
The angle is (0, 360).
| electron sector | after correction | ||
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 |
The angle is (0, 360).
| vs | vs | vs |
Insert the same table as above but with the cut 1.0 < W < 1.5
| vs | vs | vs |
Insert the same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.5 GeV and -0.2 < < 0
| vs | vs | vs |
Dr. Forest, I have applied the cut only on : 0.4 < < 0.6.(I know it does not look as good as it should be.)
| electron sector | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 |