Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
[[Image:phi_angle_difference_for_ALL_sectors_in_CM_frame_27_files_corrected_cuts.gif|500px]]<br> | [[Image:phi_angle_difference_for_ALL_sectors_in_CM_frame_27_files_corrected_cuts.gif|500px]]<br> | ||
[[Image:phi_angle_difference_fnot_sure.gif|500px]]<br> | [[Image:phi_angle_difference_fnot_sure.gif|500px]]<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ;phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector | ||
| + | 9 files. The cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_1_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]][[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_6_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]]<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_2_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_3_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]] | ||
| + | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_4_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]]<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_5_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]] | ||
Revision as of 03:08, 23 June 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
The angle is (0, 360).
| electron sector | after correction | ||
| 1 |  |
 |
|
| 2 |  |
 |
|
| 3 |  |
 |
|
| 4 |  |
 |
|
| 5 |  |
 |
|
| 6 |  |
 |
|
The angle is (0, 360).
I have applied the following cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
| electron sector | after correction | |||
| 1 |  |
 |
|
|
| 2 |  |
 |
|
|
| 3 |  |
 |
|
|
| 4 |  |
 |
|
|
| 5 |  |
 |
|
|
| 6 |  |
 |
|
|
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
9 files. The cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
I used 27 files. The cut is applied on .
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_pion_sector
