Phi angle in CM frame for different runs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=EC_total, <math>cos \theta_{pion}^{CM}</math>, missing mass, <math>\theta_{e}</math> vs <math>\phi_{e}</math>= | =EC_total, <math>cos\theta_{pion}^{CM}</math> vs \phi_{diff}^{CM}, missing mass, <math>\theta_{e}</math> vs <math>\phi_{e}</math>= | ||
Revision as of 01:43, 23 June 2008
EC_total, [math]\displaystyle{ cos\theta_{pion}^{CM} }[/math] vs \phi_{diff}^{CM}, missing mass, [math]\displaystyle{ \theta_{e} }[/math] vs [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{e} }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ \varphi^{LAB} }[/math]
The angle is (0, 360).
[math]\displaystyle{ \varphi^{CM} }[/math]
The angle is (0, 360).
I have applied the following cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
I used 27 files. The cut is applied on [math]\displaystyle{ 1.6 < Q^{2} < 1.9 }[/math].
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_pion_sector