Difference between revisions of "Analysis"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
  
  
[[Image/right:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br>
+
[[/rightImage:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br>
  
 
=====<math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>=====
 
=====<math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>=====

Revision as of 23:18, 6 August 2007

Particle Identification

Electron

Cuts

Calorimeter based cuts

The distributions below represent two types of cuts applied to improve the electron particle identification (PID) using a 4 GeV electron beam incident on an NH3 target. The electron calorimeter is segmented into an innerECinner and an outerECouter region. The total energy absorbed by the calorimeter system is recorded in the variable ECtot. The momentum (P) is calculated using the reconstructed track and the known torus magnetic field. The distributions of ECtot and ECinner are shown below where both have been divided by the electron momentum and no cuts have been applied.


ECtot>0.2p

Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut ECtot>0.2p we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018.


200 px

ECinner>0.08p

Etotal over P using inner cut.gif

After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.
Einner over P using inner cut.gif

Both cuts are applied

Etotal over P using both cuts.gif

In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the energy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36%

Einner over P using both cuts.gif

summary table

Pion

Quality Checks

Rates

Asymmetries