Difference between revisions of "Analysis"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
==Electron==
 
==Electron==
  
== Cuts ==
+
=== Cuts ===
  
 
  <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math>
 
  <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math>
  
  
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 50 px]]<br>
+
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 100 px]]<br>
 
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br>
 
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br>
  

Revision as of 15:44, 6 August 2007

Particle Identification

Electron

Cuts

[math]EC_{tot}\gt 0.2*p[/math]


Etotal over P using tot cut.gif
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut [math]EC_{tot}\gt 0.2*p[/math] we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018.


Einner over P using tot cut.gif


[math]EC_{inner}\gt 0.08*p[/math]

Etotal over P using inner cut.gif

After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.
Einner over P using inner cut.gif

Both cuts are applied

Etotal over P using both cuts.gif

In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the eneregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36%

Einner over P using both cuts.gif

Pion

Quality Checks

Rates

Asymmetries