Difference between revisions of "Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Cuts) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> | <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | ||
+ | Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. That means that the cut on the total deposited energy cuts of ~29.45% of entries.<br> | ||
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math> | <math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math> |
Revision as of 04:25, 3 August 2007
Particle Identification
Electron
Pion
Quality Checks
Rates
Asymmetries
Cuts
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. That means that the cut on the total deposited energy cuts of ~29.45% of entries.
Both cuts are applied