Difference between revisions of "170049 1% Se Soil Mixture Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
=Nickel Foil Information= | =Nickel Foil Information= | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | For the nickel I have been using counting statistics (<math> \sqrt N</math>) to find the error in the signal. This is due to the fact that I can pin down the half life within uncertainty using this type of error. | ||
Below is a table for the front outer nickel foil that was used in the sample. | Below is a table for the front outer nickel foil that was used in the sample. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| border="3" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | ||
+ | || || 5/23/17 ||5/25/17 || 5/27/17|| 5/29/17 || 5/30/17 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Thin Window Histogram || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Original Histogram || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Signal in Thin Window || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Signal in Expanded Window || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||<math> S_{Expanded} - S_{Thin} </math>|| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Integrated Background || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Signal - Background || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Runtime (s) || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Rate (Hz) || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Integral Decay Correction (Hz) || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Dead Time (%) || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Dead Time Corrected Signal (Hz) || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||.Dat File Entry For HL Plot || | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Below is the table for the rear outer foil: | ||
{| border="3" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | {| border="3" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" |
Revision as of 20:52, 21 February 2018
Below is the information for the target
Front Outer Nickel Foil: 3.4274g
Outer Se: 0.0914g
Soil: 10.240g
Inner Front Foil: 1.8672g
Inner Rear Foil: 1.7220g
Inner Se: 0.0954g
Rear Outer Foil: 3.4887g
Below is a table with the data that is to be analyzed for the mixture:
Below is the table for the pure selenium sample which was outside the aluminum cylinder
Nickel Foil Information
For the nickel I have been using counting statistics (
) to find the error in the signal. This is due to the fact that I can pin down the half life within uncertainty using this type of error.Below is a table for the front outer nickel foil that was used in the sample.
5/23/17 | 5/25/17 | 5/27/17 | 5/29/17 | 5/30/17 | |
Thin Window Histogram | |||||
Original Histogram | |||||
Signal in Thin Window | |||||
Signal in Expanded Window | |||||
Integrated Background | |||||
Signal - Background | |||||
Runtime (s) | |||||
Rate (Hz) | |||||
Integral Decay Correction (Hz) | |||||
Dead Time (%) | |||||
Dead Time Corrected Signal (Hz) | |||||
.Dat File Entry For HL Plot |
Below is the table for the rear outer foil:
5/23/17 | 5/29/17 | 5/30/17 | |
Thin Window Histogram | |||
Expanded Window Histogram | |||
Signal in Thin Window | |||
Signal in Expanded Window | |||
Integrated Background | |||
Signal - Background | |||
Runtime (s) | |||
Rate (Hz) | |||
Integral Decay Correction (Hz) | |||
Dead Time (%) | |||
Dead Time Corrected Signal (Hz) | |||
.Dat File Entry For HL Plot |