Difference between revisions of "Linear Fits"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[[File:OSL_Cal_As_Of_01-09-18.png|400px|thumb|left|<math> {\chi}^2 = 18.1258</math>, <math> \text{# of Degrees of Freedom} = 9</math> this image has the high dose PMT counts scaled by 15, which is roughly equivalent to the low dose sloped divided by the high dose slope]] | [[File:OSL_Cal_As_Of_01-09-18.png|400px|thumb|left|<math> {\chi}^2 = 18.1258</math>, <math> \text{# of Degrees of Freedom} = 9</math> this image has the high dose PMT counts scaled by 15, which is roughly equivalent to the low dose sloped divided by the high dose slope]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 23:11, 9 January 2018
Initial Fits
These fits are listed dose (from Landauer) vs measured dose (from OSL reader).
Calculated Dose vs PMT Counts
These fits were created using OSLs I irradiated using the 9.3Ci
Source. I calculated the dose the OSLs should have on them using the dose calculations on the previous page. The PMT counts came straight from the OSL reader.Number of degrees of freedom = data points - fit parameters
I should note that the low dose calibration factor from the OSL reader is 9.496494 and 0.6806084 for the high dose. These values are close to the slopes of their respective linear fits.
Up to date fit