Difference between revisions of "Reproducibility Shots July 2017"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I have overlaid X and Y profiles as well as created 3D renderings of the beam profile for the front and back sets of OSLs. Note that it is flat due to the distance at which the board was placed from the end of the accelerator.  
 
I have overlaid X and Y profiles as well as created 3D renderings of the beam profile for the front and back sets of OSLs. Note that it is flat due to the distance at which the board was placed from the end of the accelerator.  
  
Diode diameter:2"
+
Diode diameter: 2"
  
gap: 1.5"
+
Diode gap: 1.5"
  
 
Al vacuum plate thickness: 5/8"
 
Al vacuum plate thickness: 5/8"
Line 13: Line 13:
 
Ta thickness: 0.020"  
 
Ta thickness: 0.020"  
  
Distance from the Ta plate to the center of Ti rolled edge: 110 cm
+
Distance to Board: 109 cm
 
 
Diode current vs time: see attached file
 
  
 
[[File:Shot 1 Front Jul2017.png|400px|thumb|left|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]]
 
[[File:Shot 1 Front Jul2017.png|400px|thumb|left|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]]

Revision as of 20:03, 26 July 2017

Shot 169

In this experiment, I picked 17 different points on my OSL board to test agreement between two OSLs at the same physical location for the same shot from TriMeV.

I have overlaid X and Y profiles as well as created 3D renderings of the beam profile for the front and back sets of OSLs. Note that it is flat due to the distance at which the board was placed from the end of the accelerator.

Diode diameter: 2"

Diode gap: 1.5"

Al vacuum plate thickness: 5/8"

Ta thickness: 0.020"

Distance to Board: 109 cm

*Unknown calibration on OSL reader
*Unknown calibration on OSL reader
*Unknown calibration on OSL reader
*Unknown calibration on OSL reader




TriMeV Shot Log