Difference between revisions of "Physics2017 SRP"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#Compare Department performance in 2009 to current performance showing the impact of having a department with more than 6 faculty | #Compare Department performance in 2009 to current performance showing the impact of having a department with more than 6 faculty | ||
#Compare the number of full time faculty in peer institutions (ISU=6, average of peer institutions=13) | #Compare the number of full time faculty in peer institutions (ISU=6, average of peer institutions=13) | ||
| + | #delineate how the reduction in faculty has prevented regular faculty rotations through courses offered by the program, faculty are needed in upper division courses | ||
| + | |||
#Identify currently faculty that are willing to assume the responsibilities of a Department Chair | #Identify currently faculty that are willing to assume the responsibilities of a Department Chair | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 22:10, 6 April 2017
Physics Short Range Plan
Goals
Create a 1-2 page document that advocates the hiring of new physics faculty at the associates level.
Outline Arguments
- Compare Department performance in 2009 to current performance showing the impact of having a department with more than 6 faculty
- Compare the number of full time faculty in peer institutions (ISU=6, average of peer institutions=13)
- delineate how the reduction in faculty has prevented regular faculty rotations through courses offered by the program, faculty are needed in upper division courses
- Identify currently faculty that are willing to assume the responsibilities of a Department Chair