Difference between revisions of "Fast neutron damage to HPGe Detector"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[File:MaxHPGeCF252Time.png|700px]] | [[File:MaxHPGeCF252Time.png|700px]] | ||
− | + | *The formula used in the graph above : | |
<math>y=\frac{5\times 10^6}{(19066 * 60^2 * 24 * \frac{1}{(4*\pi * x^2)})}</math> | <math>y=\frac{5\times 10^6}{(19066 * 60^2 * 24 * \frac{1}{(4*\pi * x^2)})}</math> |
Revision as of 06:58, 29 December 2016
An observable decrease in the energy resolution of a large HPGe was first seen after the irradiation of 5*10^7 n/cm^2<ref>P. H. Stelson, J. K. Dickens, S. Raman, and R. C. Trammell, “Deterioration of Large Ge(Li) Diodes Caused by Fast Neutrons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods 98,481 (1972).</ref>, so I consider a factor of ten below this to be a good conservative amount to make the maximum.
The maximum neutron flux occurs exactly at the center of the detector, where the expression for integral flux is simply:
.The number of days it would take to reach an integral flux of 5*10^6 n/cm^2, as a function of the distance from source to HPGe face is shown below. The graph assumes the activity of the Cf-252 source as of 01/2017, which is 19,066 n/s.
- The formula used in the graph above :
References
<references />