Difference between revisions of "Fast neutron damage to HPGe Detector"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A decrease in the energy resolution of a large HPGe was first seen after the irradiation of <math>5\times 10^7 n/cm^2 </math><ref>P. H. Stelson, J. K. Dickens, S. Raman, and R. C. Trammell, “Deterioration of Large Ge(Li) Diodes Caused by Fast Neutrons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods 98,481 (1972).</ref>, so <math>5\times 10^6 n/cm^2 </math> is a safe number to stay under.  
 
A decrease in the energy resolution of a large HPGe was first seen after the irradiation of <math>5\times 10^7 n/cm^2 </math><ref>P. H. Stelson, J. K. Dickens, S. Raman, and R. C. Trammell, “Deterioration of Large Ge(Li) Diodes Caused by Fast Neutrons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods 98,481 (1972).</ref>, so <math>5\times 10^6 n/cm^2 </math> is a safe number to stay under.  
  
The maximum flux occurs right at the center of the detector, where the expression for flux simplifies to <math>n_{rate}\frac{1}{4\pi d^2}</math>
+
The maximum flux occurs right at the center of the detector, where the expression for flux simplifies to <math>n_{rate}\frac{1}{4\pi d^2}</math>.  The number of hours taken to reach an integral flux of <math>5\times 10^6 n/cm^2 </math>, as a function of the CF-252 source distance HPGe face, is shown below. This graph assumes the current activity of the Cf252 source on 01/2017.
  
  

Revision as of 06:11, 29 December 2016

A decrease in the energy resolution of a large HPGe was first seen after the irradiation of 5×107n/cm2<ref>P. H. Stelson, J. K. Dickens, S. Raman, and R. C. Trammell, “Deterioration of Large Ge(Li) Diodes Caused by Fast Neutrons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods 98,481 (1972).</ref>, so 5×106n/cm2 is a safe number to stay under.

The maximum flux occurs right at the center of the detector, where the expression for flux simplifies to nrate14πd2. The number of hours taken to reach an integral flux of 5×106n/cm2, as a function of the CF-252 source distance HPGe face, is shown below. This graph assumes the current activity of the Cf252 source on 01/2017.


References

<references />