Difference between revisions of "LB RunGroupC Vertex"
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
It would seem that increasing the length of the target in the Z direction has an effect on the resolution of the Y vertex position along with how far the center of the Gaussian peak will shift for the Y vertex differences. | It would seem that increasing the length of the target in the Z direction has an effect on the resolution of the Y vertex position along with how far the center of the Gaussian peak will shift for the Y vertex differences. | ||
− | === Localized Vertex Resolution Investigation === | + | === Localized Vertex Resolution Investigation of Line Targets === |
=Elastic electron proton GEMC 2.4 & Coatjava 2.4= | =Elastic electron proton GEMC 2.4 & Coatjava 2.4= |
Revision as of 18:27, 26 July 2016
Vertex Reconstruction studies
Inclusive electron GEMC 2.4 & Coatjava 2.4
Summary
Set all histogram ranges to -6,6 cm and bin sizes of 0.1 cm
Point target X,Y,Z=0 cm
No Rastering | |
---|---|
Vx Difference | |
Vy Difference | |
Vz Difference | |
X Resolution (cm) | 0.2362 +/- 0.0008 |
Y Resolution(cm) | 0.09809 +/- 0.00033 |
Z Resolution (cm) | 0.05435 +/- 0.00017 |
These histograms raise some questions. To begin I created a LUND file with 6 GeV incident electrons at 25 degrees in theta and 0 degrees in phi. All of the vertex positions were set to 0. I then ran GEMC 2.4 using the command line ~/src/CLAS/GEMC/source/gemc -USE_GUI=0 -INPUT_GEN_FILE="LUND,No_Raster.LUND" -N=75000 eg12_sol_No_Raster.gcard
which created an output file called eg12_sol_75k_No_Raster.ev. After that the reconstruction command line used was
~/src/CLAS/coatjava-2.4/bin/clas12-reconstruction -i eg12_sol_75k_No_Raster.ev-config GEOM::new=true -config MAG::torus=-1.0 -config MAG::solenoid=1.0 -o eg12_sol_75k_No_Raster_rec.evio -s DCHB:DCTB:EC:FTOF:EB -config DATA::mc=true -config DCTB::useRaster=true
After the reconstruction a root file was created using
~/src/CLAS/evio2root/bin/evio2root eg12_sol_75k_No_Raster_rec.evio eg12_sol_75k_No_Raster_rec.root 75000
A plot was then created to show the X Vertex and Y Vertex Differences
The first question is why is there a shift in the Y Difference. What would make X more centered around 0? The next question is when rastering begins, why do the resolutions in the X Vertices remain unchanged while the resolutions in the Y Vertices change?
Point in 2-D but extended target in 1-D
Two vertex variables are fixed at zero and the third vertex variable is altered
Extended target -3 < Z < 3 cm
Extended target in Z. Vy shift analysis
All Histograms below were created by simply making the target longer along the Z axis. Each case uses vertex points for X and Y ranging from -1cm to 1cm
It would seem that increasing the length of the target in the Z direction has an effect on the resolution of the Y vertex position along with how far the center of the Gaussian peak will shift for the Y vertex differences.
Localized Vertex Resolution Investigation of Line Targets
Elastic electron proton GEMC 2.4 & Coatjava 2.4
References
https://clasweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/TF_EG12_Vertex#Z_resolution_With_micro-megas