Difference between revisions of "Elastic scattering"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[File:Theta.png|750px]] | [[File:Theta.png|750px]] | ||
− | Because of the high tendency of neutrons to scatter at sharp angles, my analysis simply considers any neutron that scatters as ''contaminated'' data. Below and to the left is a plot of the total scattering cross section of Th-232. To the right is the percent contamination of my simulation for r=3.1mm. For this radius, an MCNP F4 tally gave an average neutron track length within the target of 3.7 mm. All simulated neutrons are included in this plot, i.e. neutrons are not thrown away if they are traveling towards the ground or ceiling. | + | Because of the high tendency of neutrons to scatter at sharp angles, my analysis simply considers any neutron that scatters as ''contaminated'' data. Below and to the left is a plot of the total scattering cross section of Th-232. To the right is the percent contamination of my simulation for r=3.1mm. For this radius, an MCNP F4 tally gave an average neutron track length within the target of 3.7 mm. All simulated neutrons are included in this plot, i.e. neutrons are not thrown away if they are traveling towards the ground or ceiling. The percent contamination matches very closely with the probability of interaction from the total cross section. |
[[File:Crosssection-contam2.png|900px]] | [[File:Crosssection-contam2.png|900px]] |
Revision as of 02:45, 23 December 2015
The simulation
Neutrons are generated uniformly within a cylindrical target their energy sampled from a Watt fission spectrum. The angle between the direction that the neutron is traveling at birth and upon exiting the target volume is calculated. The figure below illustrates the angle that was calculated.
Neutrons that exit the target on a trajectory which will not intersect with a detector are not counted, e.g. neutrons going towards the ceiling or the ground.
Thorium-232
Out of the neutrons that did scatter in the target, at least 96% did so at an angle greater than 10 degrees. Below is the distribution of the angle of deflection for all the neutrons that did scatter. In this example, the target has a radius of 3 mm, and 8.2% of total simulated neutrons did scatter in the target (at least once).
Because of the high tendency of neutrons to scatter at sharp angles, my analysis simply considers any neutron that scatters as contaminated data. Below and to the left is a plot of the total scattering cross section of Th-232. To the right is the percent contamination of my simulation for r=3.1mm. For this radius, an MCNP F4 tally gave an average neutron track length within the target of 3.7 mm. All simulated neutrons are included in this plot, i.e. neutrons are not thrown away if they are traveling towards the ground or ceiling. The percent contamination matches very closely with the probability of interaction from the total cross section.
Below shows the percent contamination vs target radius for various different energy intervals. The energy of the neutron once it exits the target is the energy used for this data.
Go back JB Analysis