Difference between revisions of "Notes from July 2nd, 2008 Meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<math>10^{-3} \frac{\frac{\gamma 's}{MeV}}{\frac{e^{-}}{radiation lengths}} \times 2 \cdot 10^{-4} radiation lengths \times 15 MeV \times 9.4 \cdot 10^{12} \frac{e^{-}}{sec}=2.8 \cdot 10^{7} \frac{\gamma}{sec}</math> | <math>10^{-3} \frac{\frac{\gamma 's}{MeV}}{\frac{e^{-}}{radiation lengths}} \times 2 \cdot 10^{-4} radiation lengths \times 15 MeV \times 9.4 \cdot 10^{12} \frac{e^{-}}{sec}=2.8 \cdot 10^{7} \frac{\gamma}{sec}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Number of ɣ + d -> n + p events/sec== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>2.8 \cdot 10^{7} \frac{\gamma}{sec} \times 4 \cdot 10^{-4} = 10^{4}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Probability of Photodisintegration Event== | ||
+ | |||
+ | target thickness in <math>\frac{Dnuclei}{cm^{2}} \times \sigma in cm^{2}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Worst Case Isotropic Neutrons== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let's say we have: | ||
+ | |||
+ | radius detector = 1 cm | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1 meter away | ||
+ | |||
+ | fractional solid angle = <math>\frac{\pi * (1 cm)^{2}}{4 \pi (100cm^{2}} = \frac{1}{4} \times 10^{-4}</math> <= geometrical acceptance | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10° efficient of n° detection | ||
+ | <math> 10^{4} \frac{photodisintegrations}{sec} \times \frac{1}{4} \cdot 10^{-4} \times 10^{-1} = .025 \frac{events}{sec}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | time for <math>10^{4}</math> events = 100 hours for 1% | ||
+ | ::::24 hours for 2% | ||
+ | ::::6 hours for 4% | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Therefore, this experiment is do able.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back] |
Latest revision as of 06:26, 5 February 2009
Numbers for rate of Brems intensity spectrum:
=
Number of ɣ + d -> n + p events/sec
Probability of Photodisintegration Event
target thickness in
Worst Case Isotropic Neutrons
Let's say we have:
radius detector = 1 cm
1 meter away
fractional solid angle =
<= geometrical acceptance10° efficient of n° detection
time for
events = 100 hours for 1%- 24 hours for 2%
- 6 hours for 4%
Therefore, this experiment is do able.