Difference between revisions of "4-vectors"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<center><math>\textbf{\underline{Navigation}}</math>
+
<center><math>\underline{\textbf{Navigation}}</math>
  
[[Relativistic_Frames_of_Reference|<math>\vartriangleleft </math>]]
+
[[Relativistic_Units|<math>\vartriangleleft </math>]]
 
[[VanWasshenova_Thesis#Moller_Scattering|<math>\triangle </math>]]
 
[[VanWasshenova_Thesis#Moller_Scattering|<math>\triangle </math>]]
 
[[4-momenta|<math>\vartriangleright </math>]]
 
[[4-momenta|<math>\vartriangleright </math>]]
Line 54: Line 54:
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
  
 +
This gives the desired results as expected.
  
 
<center><math>(ds)^2 \equiv (dx^0)^{2}-(dx^1)^2-(dx^2)^2-(dx^3)^2=(dx^0)^{'2}-(dx^1)^{'2}-(dx^2)^{'2}-(dx^3)^{'2}</math></center>
 
<center><math>(ds)^2 \equiv (dx^0)^{2}-(dx^1)^2-(dx^2)^2-(dx^3)^2=(dx^0)^{'2}-(dx^1)^{'2}-(dx^2)^{'2}-(dx^3)^{'2}</math></center>
Line 129: Line 130:
  
  
 
Using the Lorentz transformations and the index notation,
 
 
<center><math>
 
\begin{cases}
 
t'=\gamma (t-vz/c^2) \\
 
 
x'=x' \\
 
 
y'=y' \\
 
 
z'=\gamma (z-vt)
 
\end{cases}
 
</math></center>
 
 
 
<center><math>\begin{bmatrix}
 
x'^0 \\
 
x'^1 \\
 
x'^2\\
 
x'^3
 
\end{bmatrix}=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\gamma (x^0-vx^3/c)  \\
 
x^1 \\
 
x^2 \\
 
\gamma (x^3-vx^0)
 
\end{bmatrix}
 
=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\gamma (x^0-\beta x^3)  \\
 
x^1 \\
 
x^2 \\
 
\gamma (x^3-vx^0)
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
 
 
 
<center>Where <math>\beta \equiv \frac{v}{c}</math></center>
 
 
This can be expressed in matrix form as
 
 
<center><math>\begin{bmatrix}
 
x'^0 \\
 
x'^1 \\
 
x'^2\\
 
x'^3
 
\end{bmatrix}=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\gamma & 0 & 0 & -\gamma \beta  \\
 
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
 
-\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 & \gamma
 
\end{bmatrix}
 
\cdot
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
x^0  \\
 
x^1 \\
 
x^2 \\
 
x^3
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
 
 
Letting the indices run from 0 to 3, we can write
 
 
<center><math>\mathbf x'^{\mu}=\sum_{\nu=0}^3 (\Lambda_{\nu}^{\mu}) \mathbf x^{\nu}</math></center>
 
 
 
<center>Where <math>\Lambda</math> is the Lorentz transformation matrix for motion in the z direction.</center>
 
 
 
The Lorentz transformations are also invariant in that they are just a rotation, i.e. Det <math>\Lambda=1</math>.  The inner product is preserved,
 
 
 
 
<center><math>\Lambda_{\nu}^{\mu} \eta_{\nu}^{\mu} \Lambda_{\mu}^{\nu}=\eta_{\nu}^{\mu}</math></center>
 
 
 
<center><math>
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\gamma & 0 & 0 & -\gamma \beta  \\
 
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
 
-\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 & \gamma
 
\end{bmatrix}\cdot
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
1 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 &-1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -1
 
\end{bmatrix}\cdot
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\gamma & 0 & 0 & -\gamma \beta  \\
 
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
 
-\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 & \gamma
 
\end{bmatrix}^T=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
1 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 &-1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -1
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
 
 
 
<center><math>
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\gamma^2-\beta^2 \gamma^2 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -\gamma^2+\beta^2 \gamma^2
 
\end{bmatrix}=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
1 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 &-1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -1
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
 
 
 
<center><math>
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\gamma^2(1-\beta^2) & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -\gamma^2(1-\beta^2)
 
\end{bmatrix}=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
1 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 &-1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -1
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
 
 
 
<center>Where <math>\gamma \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}</math></center>
 
 
 
<center><math>
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
\frac{\gamma^2}{\gamma^2} & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -\frac{\gamma^2}{\gamma^2}
 
\end{bmatrix}=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
1 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 &-1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -1
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
 
 
 
 
<center><math>
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
1 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -1
 
\end{bmatrix}=
 
\begin{bmatrix}
 
1 & 0 & 0 & 0  \\
 
0 &-1 & 0 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
 
0 & 0 & 0 & -1
 
\end{bmatrix}</math></center>
 
  
  
Line 306: Line 136:
  
  
<center><math>\textbf{\underline{Navigation}}</math>
+
<center><math>\underline{\textbf{Navigation}}</math>
  
[[Relativistic_Frames_of_Reference|<math>\vartriangleleft </math>]]
+
[[Relativistic_Units|<math>\vartriangleleft </math>]]
 
[[VanWasshenova_Thesis#Moller_Scattering|<math>\triangle </math>]]
 
[[VanWasshenova_Thesis#Moller_Scattering|<math>\triangle </math>]]
 
[[4-momenta|<math>\vartriangleright </math>]]
 
[[4-momenta|<math>\vartriangleright </math>]]
  
 
</center>
 
</center>

Latest revision as of 18:47, 15 May 2018

Navigation_

4-vectors

Using index notation, the time and space coordinates can be combined into a single "4-vector" , that has units of length(i.e. ct is a distance).


We can express the space time interval using the index notation



Since is nothing more than a dot product of a vector with itself, we should expect the components of the indices to follow a similar relationship. Following the rules of matrix multiplication, the dot product of two 4-vectors should follow the form:


This gives the desired results as expected.


The change in signs in the covariant term,

from the contravarient term


Comes from the Minkowski metric







Similarly, for two different 4-vectors,



This is useful in that it shows that the scalar product of two 4-vectors is an invariant since the time-space interval is an invariant.