Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Energy Line1D"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
: <math>t = \int \pm \sqrt{\frac{m}{2\left (E-U(x) \right )}} dx = \int dt </math> | : <math>t = \int \pm \sqrt{\frac{m}{2\left (E-U(x) \right )}} dx = \int dt </math> | ||
::<math> = \sqrt{\frac{m}{2}} \int_{x_0}^x\left (E-U(x) \right )^{-\frac{1}{2}} dx </math> | ::<math> = \sqrt{\frac{m}{2}} \int_{x_0}^x\left (E-U(x) \right )^{-\frac{1}{2}} dx </math> | ||
+ | ::<math> = \sqrt{\frac{m}{2}} \int_{x_0}^x\left (E-\frac{1}{2}kx^2 \right )^{-\frac{1}{2}} dx </math> | ||
[[Forest_UCM_Energy#Energy_for_Linear_1-D_systems]] | [[Forest_UCM_Energy#Energy_for_Linear_1-D_systems]] |
Revision as of 12:20, 26 September 2014
The equation of motion for a system restricted to 1-D is readily solved from conservation of energy when the force is conservative.
- cosntant
The ambiguity in the sign of the above relation, due to the square root operation, is easily resolved in one dimension by inspection and more difficult to resolve in 3-D.
The velocity can change direction (signs) during the motion. In such cases it is best to separte the inegral into a part for one direction of the velocity and a second integral for the case of a negative velocity.
spring example
Consider the problem of a mass attached to a spring in 1-D.
The potential is given by