Difference between revisions of "PePPO 05302012"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '=Runlist= {| border="1" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 |- | || Signal channel || HV dac || HV (V) || readback |- | Run No. || Run Time (s) || e- Current (n…')
 
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
=Data Analysis=
 
=Data Analysis=
 +
 +
==Calibration==
 +
 +
 +
https://positron.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/05232012_AnnihCntr_Calibration#Results
 +
 +
 +
The calibration constants appear to have changed from
 +
 +
511/22230 for Annihlation Detector A1 to 511/29588  (ped subtracted)
 +
 +
511/18192 for Annihlation Detector A3  to 511/13706  (ped subtracted)
 +
 +
 +
Fits to the peaks in run 5440 and 5441 gave the following results
 +
 +
{| border="1"  |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0
 +
|-
 +
|      Energy      || A1 Channel || A3 Channel
 +
|-
 +
| 0  || 40002 ||41709.5
 +
|-
 +
|  511 ||  69655.5 || 55603.8
 +
|-
 +
|  1170  || 100127  || 71544.4
 +
|-
 +
|  1270  || 104293  || 74165.3
 +
|-
 +
|  1330  ||  106243 || 75307.7
 +
|}
 +
 +
 +
The high energy points overweight the linear fit for that energy region so I removed the 1179 and 1270 line from the fit.
 +
For A1 :
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
slope=50.1811 +/- 2.10455
 +
y-intercept=41498.3 +/- 1894.94
 +
coerrelation coefficient=0.998246
 +
</pre>
 +
For A3:
 +
<pre>
 +
slope=25.3515 +/- 0.488128
 +
y-intercept=42052.6 +/- 439.513
 +
coerrelation coefficient=0.999628
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
A fit biased by including three 1 MeV lines is
 +
;For A1
 +
<pre>
 +
slope=45.8536 +/- 0.50289
 +
y-intercept=46253.9 +/- 522.854
 +
coerrelation coefficient=0.999941
 +
</pre>
 +
;For A3
 +
<pre>
 +
slope=24.3591 +/- 0.219479
 +
y-intercept=43143.2 +/- 228.192
 +
coerrelation coefficient=0.999961
 +
</pre>
 +
  
 
==Target IN/OUT==
 
==Target IN/OUT==

Revision as of 03:52, 12 June 2012

Runlist

Signal channel HV dac HV (V) readback
Run No. Run Time (s) e- Current (nA) Converter Target Mode DAQ Rate (Hz) Chromox Target Position
5767 1566 1 1 mm thick W positron In
5768 1763 1 1 mm thick W positron Out
5774 1 1 mm thick W positron 75 IN
5775 1 0.1 mm thick W positron 75 IN
5776 1408 0.5 1 mm thick W positron 75 In
5778 858 0.5 1 mm thick W positron 50 Out
5779 1338 0.5 0.5 mm thick W positron 50 In

Data Analysis

Calibration

https://positron.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/05232012_AnnihCntr_Calibration#Results


The calibration constants appear to have changed from

511/22230 for Annihlation Detector A1 to 511/29588 (ped subtracted)

511/18192 for Annihlation Detector A3 to 511/13706 (ped subtracted)


Fits to the peaks in run 5440 and 5441 gave the following results

Energy A1 Channel A3 Channel
0 40002 41709.5
511 69655.5 55603.8
1170 100127 71544.4
1270 104293 74165.3
1330 106243 75307.7


The high energy points overweight the linear fit for that energy region so I removed the 1179 and 1270 line from the fit. For A1 :

slope=50.1811 +/- 2.10455
y-intercept=41498.3 +/- 1894.94 
coerrelation coefficient=0.998246

For A3:

slope=25.3515 +/- 0.488128
y-intercept=42052.6 +/- 439.513 
coerrelation coefficient=0.999628

A fit biased by including three 1 MeV lines is

For A1
slope=45.8536 +/- 0.50289
y-intercept=46253.9 +/- 522.854 
coerrelation coefficient=0.999941
For A3
slope=24.3591 +/- 0.219479
y-intercept=43143.2 +/- 228.192 
coerrelation coefficient=0.999961


Target IN/OUT

Run 5767 & 5768

400 px

Run 5776 & 5778

Tight TDC cits TDC_A1-TDC_A3 < 5 nsec

Rates-vs- Converter thickness

Run No. Run Time (s) e- Current (nA) Converter Target Mode Chromox Target Position
5774 489 1 1 mm thick W positron IN
5775 347 1 0.1 mm thick W positron IN
5776 1408 0.5 1 mm thick W positron In
5779 1338 0.5 0.5 mm thick W positron In

Run 5774 & 5775

Calibration: 60 Ch/keV

400 px

Run 5776 & 5779

Calibration: 60 Ch/keV

400 px


[