Difference between revisions of "Yields and Asymmetry versus Energy Cuts."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/2n_correlations_in_Photofission go back] | [https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/2n_correlations_in_Photofission go back] | ||
+ | |||
Follow are some Monte Carlo simulations of 2n correlations. One neutron are from one FF, two neutrons per fission. No accidental neutron was considered, all neutrons are correlated. Total 10M events was simulated. Every neutron was sampled up to 10 MeV. The polarization of gammas are zero. | Follow are some Monte Carlo simulations of 2n correlations. One neutron are from one FF, two neutrons per fission. No accidental neutron was considered, all neutrons are correlated. Total 10M events was simulated. Every neutron was sampled up to 10 MeV. The polarization of gammas are zero. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==2n Asymmetry versus Energy Cut== | ||
+ | |||
+ | It was shown before by Dr Dale the Asymmetry of 2n correlations (anti-parallel/parallel) is the strong function of energy cuts for each neutrons and increase as energy cut increase. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:2n energy correlations vs cut.png | 800px]] | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 15 June 2011
Follow are some Monte Carlo simulations of 2n correlations. One neutron are from one FF, two neutrons per fission. No accidental neutron was considered, all neutrons are correlated. Total 10M events was simulated. Every neutron was sampled up to 10 MeV. The polarization of gammas are zero.
2n Asymmetry versus Energy Cut
It was shown before by Dr Dale the Asymmetry of 2n correlations (anti-parallel/parallel) is the strong function of energy cuts for each neutrons and increase as energy cut increase.