Difference between revisions of "05/19/2011 n's detector threshold calibration source/(w/source)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[File:Det1 calibraton source 1250 1500.png | 600 px]] [[File:Det1 calibraton source 1250 1500 log.png | 600 px]] | [[File:Det1 calibraton source 1250 1500.png | 600 px]] [[File:Det1 calibraton source 1250 1500 log.png | 600 px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''There are no any plateaus, so what is the threshold should be?''' | ||
Line 26: | Line 29: | ||
<math>\mbox{Ratio} = \frac{R_s - R_{w/s}}{R_{w/s}}</math> | <math>\mbox{Ratio} = \frac{R_s - R_{w/s}}{R_{w/s}}</math> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 15:26, 3 June 2011
Below are my counts rate measurements as function of threshold voltage for n's detector. The source was CF252. The distance between source and n's PMT was about 50 cm. The counts rate was calculated as:
First I did my calibration for power supply voltage -1250 V:
Second I did my calibration for power supply voltage -1500 V:
And bellow I overlay both cases (-1250 V and -1500 V)
There are no any plateaus, so what is the threshold should be?
Let's recalculate data using the formula: