Difference between revisions of "HRRL 03-17-2011"
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
parabola fit for x-projection: | parabola fit for x-projection: | ||
+ | In m unit | ||
y = 3.69167*10^(-6) -3.89000*x*10^(-6) + 4.79738*x.*x*10^(-6) | y = 3.69167*10^(-6) -3.89000*x*10^(-6) + 4.79738*x.*x*10^(-6) | ||
+ | |||
+ | In mm unit | ||
+ | |||
+ | y = 3.69167 -3.89000*x + 4.79738*x.*x | ||
+ | |||
[[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_X.png | 300 px]] | [[File:HRRL 03-17-2011_Results_Q1_42mA_Pos_SupGau_X.png | 300 px]] | ||
Line 81: | Line 87: | ||
[[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt]] | [[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Data created from parabola fit | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Media:2011_Mar_Emit_data_from_fit_x.txt]] | ||
=== 42 mA, Negative Current, Y projection === | === 42 mA, Negative Current, Y projection === |
Revision as of 17:21, 17 May 2011
Accelerator Tuning
Good Tune Used for good Scan
By Dr. Kim
Calibration
image | OTR image | cal_h (mm/px) | cal_v (mm/px) |
0.04308 | 0.04204 | ||
0.04320 | 0.04228 | ||
0.04349 | 0.04181 | ||
0.04323 | 0.04196 | ||
0.04337 | 0.04212 | ||
mean (mm/px) | mean (mm/px) | ||
Results
Q1
At lower current background subtraction gets worse, because singal/noise drops.
42 mA, Positive Current, X projection
emit=0.388 +- 0.008 mm*mrad, emit_norm=10.64 +- 0.22 mm*mrad
beta=1.285 +- 0.024, alpha=0.94 +-0.03
parabola fit for x-projection:
In m unit y = 3.69167*10^(-6) -3.89000*x*10^(-6) + 4.79738*x.*x*10^(-6)
In mm unit
y = 3.69167 -3.89000*x + 4.79738*x.*x
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2
Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_x.txt
Data created from parabola fit
Media:2011_Mar_Emit_data_from_fit_x.txt
42 mA, Negative Current, Y projection
emit=0.266 +- 0.018 mm*mrad, emit_norm=7.30 +- 0.50 mm*mrad
beta=0.918 +- 0.068, alpha=0.19 +-0.06
parabola fit for y-projection:
y = 2.81806*10^(-6) + 0.52202*x*10^(-6) + 2.35025*x.*x*10^(-6)
//K1*L(1/m) er K1*L sgima^2(mm) er sigma^2
Media:2011_Mar_Emit_fit_data_y.txt
X and Y emittances are different. The parabola in X reaches min around 0.4, while in Y reaches around 0.15. Which suggests quadrupole strengths of X and Y are way different for same coil current. Which might suggest beam is not centered, because when beam is off-centered we have this can occur.
20 mA, Positive Current, X projection
10 mA, Positive Current, X projection
5 mA, Positive Current, X projection
Q4
42 mA All Other Quads off
Haven't reach minimum.
42 mA Q1_at_-2A, Q2_at_+8A, Q3_at_-6A
x-projection:
y-projection: