Difference between revisions of "05/11/2011"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| − | So it looks like my previous threshold value (-500 V) was not good. Let's set up the -200 V: | + | So it looks like my previous threshold value (-500 V) was not good. Let's set it up the -200 V. And see what happens. |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The same set up as before, the distances are the same: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Detector1.png | 400px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | First he CF-243 source is far far away (sealed in the safe): | ||
| + | {| border="1" cellspacing="0" style="text-align: center; width: 800px; height: 100px;" | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | avg counts/min | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !PS1 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !PS2 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !n's | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Now the CF-243 source is on the top of PS1: | ||
| + | {| border="1" cellspacing="0" style="text-align: center; width: 800px; height: 100px;" | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | counts/min (1 min test) | ||
| + | ! scope="col" width="50" | avg counts/min | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !PS1 | ||
| + | |378,893||378,612||377,909||378,665||'''378,519.7''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !PS2 | ||
| + | |22,729||22,819||22,572||22,530||'''22,662.5''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !PS1+PS2 | ||
| + | |1044||1021||1023||975||'''1015.7''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !n's | ||
| + | |200||210||228||219||'''214.2''' | ||
| + | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 11 May 2011
Because is something wrong I decided to measure the counts rate as function of threshold energy. Maybe my threshold was incorrect.
Below are my results for n's detector with HAMAMATSU PMT (-1500 V):
So it looks like my previous threshold value (-500 V) was not good. Let's set it up the -200 V. And see what happens.
The same set up as before, the distances are the same:
First he CF-243 source is far far away (sealed in the safe):
| counts/min (1 min test) | counts/min (1 min test) | counts/min (1 min test) | counts/min (1 min test) | avg counts/min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS1 | |||||
| PS2 | |||||
| n's |
Now the CF-243 source is on the top of PS1:
| counts/min (1 min test) | counts/min (1 min test) | counts/min (1 min test) | counts/min (1 min test) | avg counts/min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS1 | 378,893 | 378,612 | 377,909 | 378,665 | 378,519.7 |
| PS2 | 22,729 | 22,819 | 22,572 | 22,530 | 22,662.5 |
| PS1+PS2 | 1044 | 1021 | 1023 | 975 | 1015.7 |
| n's | 200 | 210 | 228 | 219 | 214.2 |