Difference between revisions of "Plastic Scintillator Calculation"
(26 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back] | ||
+ | |||
Below is the calculations done to determine the probability of pair production depending on thickness of the scintillator. | Below is the calculations done to determine the probability of pair production depending on thickness of the scintillator. | ||
Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
Molecules per <math> cm^2 (K) = \frac{4.689*10^{21}molecules PVT}{cm^3} * 1cm = \frac{4.689*10^{21}molecules PVT}{cm^2} </math> | Molecules per <math> cm^2 (K) = \frac{4.689*10^{21}molecules PVT}{cm^3} * 1cm = \frac{4.689*10^{21}molecules PVT}{cm^2} </math> | ||
− | Weighted cross-section <math> (\sigma_w) = (1.030*10^{-26}cm^2 + 9.645*10^{-26}cm^2) + | + | Weighted cross-section <math> (\sigma_w) = (10*(1.030*10^{-26}cm^2 + 9.645*10^{-26}cm^2)) + (11*(1.716*10^{-27}cm^2 + 2.688*10^{-27}cm^2)) = 1.116*10^{-24}cm^2</math> |
− | Probability of interaction (%) <math>= 1. | + | Probability of interaction (%) <math>= 1.116*10^{-24}cm^2 * \frac{4.689*10^{21}molecules PVT}{cm^2} * 100% = 0.5233%</math> |
Doing the same calculations using the Bicron BC 408 PVT with anthracene [http://webh09.cern.ch/ajbell/Documents/Optical_Fibres/BICRON%20BC408.pdf] for the material yields a probability of <math>0.5294%</math> | Doing the same calculations using the Bicron BC 408 PVT with anthracene [http://webh09.cern.ch/ajbell/Documents/Optical_Fibres/BICRON%20BC408.pdf] for the material yields a probability of <math>0.5294%</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | = A different way to calculate probability of interaction = | ||
+ | |||
+ | I checked out a few of the physics material supply sites and most of them list with their products the amounts of each individual atom per <math> cm^3</math>. Therefore there is a quicker way to calculate the probability of interaction which is listed below. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Probability of interaction per cm thickness<math> = ((\frac{NumCarbonAtoms}{cm^3} *(\sigma_{elec}C + \sigma_{nucleus}C)) + (\frac{NumHydrogenAtoms}{cm^3} *(\sigma_{elec}H + \sigma_{nucleus}H)))*100%</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using this method of calculation for Rexon RP 200 yields a probability <math> = \frac{0.5234%}{cm}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using this method for Bicron BC 408 yields a probabiltiy <math> = \frac{0.5303%}{cm} </math> | ||
[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back] | [http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back] |
Latest revision as of 18:11, 5 February 2009
Below is the calculations done to determine the probability of pair production depending on thickness of the scintillator.
Molecules per
(NOTE: is just the density of the scintillator material and N[A] is Avogadro's number)Molecules per
Weighted cross-section
Probability of interaction (%)
All cross sections listed here are pair production cross-sections
For carbon
orFor carbon
orFor hydrogen
orFor hydrogen
orAvogadro's number
Molecular formula for PVT
Density of polyvinyl toluene (a common scintillator material) [1])
(NOTE: this value is from Rexon RP 200or is it [2] (TF)H/C = 11/10
For the sample calculation the thickness will be set to 1 cm just to get probability per cm
So entering all the numbers into the 4 initial equations gives the following answers:
Molecules per
Molecules per
Weighted cross-section
Probability of interaction (%)
Doing the same calculations using the Bicron BC 408 PVT with anthracene [3] for the material yields a probability of
A different way to calculate probability of interaction
I checked out a few of the physics material supply sites and most of them list with their products the amounts of each individual atom per
. Therefore there is a quicker way to calculate the probability of interaction which is listed below.
Probability of interaction per cm thickness
Using this method of calculation for Rexon RP 200 yields a probability
Using this method for Bicron BC 408 yields a probabiltiy