Difference between revisions of "Using Carbon or Aluminum to block photons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
nσt = <math>1.2 \cdot 10^{23} \frac{atoms}{cm^{3}} \times .4 \cdot 10^{-24} cm^{2} \times 4.56 cm = .218</math> | nσt = <math>1.2 \cdot 10^{23} \frac{atoms}{cm^{3}} \times .4 \cdot 10^{-24} cm^{2} \times 4.56 cm = .218</math> | ||
− | <math> | + | <math>\,\!\, e^{-n \sigma t} => e^{.218} = .80 => 80%</math> of the photons get through the Carbon |
== What about Aluminum? == | == What about Aluminum? == | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
nσt = <math>6.022 \cdot 10^{22} \frac{atoms}{cm^{3}} \times 1.039 \cdot 10^{-24} cm^{2} \times 3.9 cm = .24</math> | nσt = <math>6.022 \cdot 10^{22} \frac{atoms}{cm^{3}} \times 1.039 \cdot 10^{-24} cm^{2} \times 3.9 cm = .24</math> | ||
− | <math>\,\!\, e^{- | + | <math>\,\!\, e^{-n \sigma t}=e^{.24}=.79=>79%</math> of the photons get through the Aluminum |
Since more gets through Carbon, we're going to forget about Aluminum and focus solely on using Carbon. | Since more gets through Carbon, we're going to forget about Aluminum and focus solely on using Carbon. | ||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 10:27, 5 June 2008
We're looking to see which is better for letting photons through, Carbon or Aluminum.
20 MeV for Carbon
range is
density of Carbon =
thickness =
Therefore, the thickness of our Carbon is 4.56 cm
10 MeV hitting 4.56 cm of Carbon
n =
σ =
nσt =
of the photons get through the Carbon
What about Aluminum?
20 MeV for Aluminum
range is
density of Carbon =
thickness =
Therefore, the thickness of our Aluminum is 3.9 cm
10 MeV hitting 3.9 cm of Aluminum
n =
σ =
nσt =
of the photons get through the Aluminum
Since more gets through Carbon, we're going to forget about Aluminum and focus solely on using Carbon.