Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
| Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
| | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-15.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-17.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-19.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-21.gif|200px]] || | | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-15.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-17.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-19.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-21.gif|200px]] || | ||
| [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-23.gif|200px]] | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-23.gif|200px]] | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {| border="1"  |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0  | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.24<W<1.26 || 1.26<W<1.28 || 1.28<W<1.3 || 1.3<W<1.32 || 1.32<W<1.34  | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-25.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-27.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-29.gif|200px]] || [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-31.gif|200px]] || | ||
| + | [[Image:cos_theta_of_pion_CM_Frame_vs_phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_W_1-33.gif|200px]] | ||
| |}<br> | |}<br> | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 24 July 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
- Electron Momentum vs EC_total
- Missing Mass
- vs
Phi lab
The angle is (0, 360).
| electron sector | after correction | ||
| 1 |  |  |   | 
| 2 |  |  |   | 
| 3 |  |  |   | 
| 4 |  |  |   | 
| 5 |  |  |   | 
| 6 |  |  |   | 
Phi CM
The phi angle after rotation and transformation to the CM frame
| electron sector | ||
| 1 |  |   | 
| 2 |  |   | 
| 3 |  |   | 
| 4 |  |   | 
| 5 |  |   | 
| 6 |  |   | 
Correlation plots with , and
The angle is (0, 360).
| vs | vs | vs | 
|  |  |   | 
Same table as above but with the cut  1.0 < W < 1.5
| vs | vs | vs | 
|  |  |   | 
Same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.25 GeV , 20 MeV bins in W and 15 degree bins in
| vs | vs | vs | 
|  |  |   | 
Same table as above but with the cuts 1.0 < W < 1.5 GeV and -0.2 < < 0
| vs | vs | vs | 
|  |  |   | 
Insert the same table as above but with the cuts 1.15 < W < 1.25 GeV and -0.1 < < 0, 20 MeV bins in W and 15 degree bins in
| vs | vs | vs | 
|  |  |   | 
Insert the same table as above but with the cuts W < 1.25 GeV and -0.1 < < 0, 20 MeV bins in W and 15 degree bins in
| vs | vs | vs | 
|  |  |   | 
Phi_angle_in_CM_Frame for different cuts
Used 1735 files. The following cuts are applied: ,  and EC cuts.
Insert plot of M_x and W to show cuts
Then insert phi -vs- theta
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
Cuts: EC_inner>0.06, EC_tot/p>0.2, nphe>2.5, ,  and .
[3]

Cuts: EC_inner>0.06, EC_tot/p>0.2, nphe>2.5, ,  and .
[4]

cos_theta_pion_CM_Frame_vs_Phi_angle_in_CM_Frame for different W(missing mass) cuts
| 1.14<W<1.16 | 1.16<W<1.18 | 1.18<W<1.2 | 1.2<W<1.22 | 1.22<W<1.24 | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| 1.24<W<1.26 | 1.26<W<1.28 | 1.28<W<1.3 | 1.3<W<1.32 | 1.32<W<1.34 | 
|  |  |  |  | 
Phi_angle_in_CM_Frame for 1.44<W<1.46
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 























